On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Never mind this here, I isolated this to 2.2 and made a JIRA.
Can you post the Jira so I can look at the summary of the problem please?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-u
Never mind this here, I isolated this to 2.2 and made a JIRA.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Here's some dialog with release:prepare
>
> [INFO] Checking dependencies and plugins for snapshots ...
> What is the release version for "Parent POM for the Juggernaut
> compo
Here's some dialog with release:prepare
[INFO] Checking dependencies and plugins for snapshots ...
What is the release version for "Parent POM for the Juggernaut
components"? (com.basistech.jug:jug-parent) 57: :
What is SCM release tag or label for "Parent POM for the Juggernaut
components"? (com.
You can't, copy-dependencies is intended to work on the current
project, and copy is intended to simply fetch another artifact only.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:15 PM, cowwoc wrote:
> Brian,
>
> How do specify a project argument for "copy-dependencies"? That is, I need
> to copy the dependencies of
Brian,
How do specify a project argument for "copy-dependencies"? That is, I need
to copy the dependencies of another project (not the current one).
Thanks,
Gili
Brian Fox-2 wrote:
>
> It does not support transitivity yet. You can use copy-dependencies and
> combinations of the filters to get
this is a known bug introduced in 2.2. The work around is to passed in
-Dtag=your-artifact-id-your-version
-D
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Andrew Eisenberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having some trouble with the release:prepare goal. I am trying to
> release version 2.5.1-1 of my artifact.
;
> Since these projects are unrelated, they can't be glued together via a
> parent pom.
I don't see why not. Consider the following example:
http://img.skitch.com/20110727-b3j3j8fk2rg4s2h9exm225skyd.png You just
need to have a hierarchy of parent poms.
Sure, if you update the top Co
Hi all,
I am having some trouble with the release:prepare goal. I am trying to
release version 2.5.1-1 of my artifact. The currently released
version is 2.5.1. The version number in the pom.xml is
2.5.1-1-SNAPSHOT. And the artifact is in a standard svn repository.
I run mvn release:prepare and
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Ansgar Konermann
wrote:
> Am 27.07.2011 08:16, schrieb Kasun Gajasinghe:
>> We don't allow downloading of different versions of same plugin which
>> in most cases does the 'same' job! So, we need the ability to set a
>> default plugin versions that are available o
Am 27.07.2011 08:16, schrieb Kasun Gajasinghe:
> We don't allow downloading of different versions of same plugin which
> in most cases does the 'same' job! So, we need the ability to set a
> default plugin versions that are available on the gentoo system.
Hi Kasun,
what about this: configure a loc
default is:
overWriteIfNewer=true
overWriteReleases = false
overWriteSnapshots=false
Setting the releases or snapshots to true will cause it to ignore the
if newer check.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:13 AM, KARR, DAVID (ATTSI) wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Brian Fox [mailto:bri...
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Fox [mailto:bri...@infinity.nu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 5:01 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Why would "unpack-dependencies" sometimes not do its job?
>
> you can set a flag to tell it to always unpack. I forget the exact
> param, but it's
On 27/07/2011 9:43 AM, Daniel Serodio (lists) wrote:
Ansgar Konermann wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 22:13, schrieb Daniel Serodio (lists):
Do you think using a classifier to differentiate artifacts built for
development and production is "hacky", is is this an appropriate
solution?
Use the same *artif
2011/7/26 Mark Derricutt :
> Before cutting the release, I start a new release branch, do the maven
> release, then when I'm happy, finish the release branch, THEN push to origin
>
> $ git flow release start 3.4.5
> $ mvn release:prepare release:perform
> $ git flow release finish 3.4.5
> $ git pu
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Daniel Serodio (lists) <
daniel.lis...@xxx.com.br> wrote:
> Ansgar Konermann wrote:
>
>> Am 25.07.2011 22:13, schrieb Daniel Serodio (lists):
>>
>>> Do you think using a classifier to differentiate artifacts built for
>>> development and production is "hacky", is i
> [ServerConnectionImpl.close():332] : Closing DM connection
> [ServerConnectionImpl.close():352] : Unregistered all listeners
> [ServerConnectionImpl.closeJMX():372] : Closed JMX connection
> [ServerConnectionImpl.closeJMX():384] : Closed Runtime JMX connection
> [ServerConnectionImpl.closeJMX():3
Ansgar Konermann wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 22:13, schrieb Daniel Serodio (lists):
Do you think using a classifier to differentiate artifacts built for
development and production is "hacky", is is this an appropriate
solution?
Use the same *artifacts* for all stages and allow for *configuring* the
r
Prabin,
The error log says that it can't find the parent pom file specified in
the agentj-core module in your source. Since maven can't find the pom
file in remote repositories, I assume you have the parent pom file
included in your source. So, look for the pom.xml file with both
groupId and artifa
hello everybody,
I am very new in using and installing maven. When I try to mvn install maven
in directory ns-allinone-2.34/ns-2.34/agentj,
it gives following error;
prabin@prabin-desktop:~$ cd $AGENTJ
prabin@prabin-desktop:~/ns-allinone-2.34/ns-2.34/agentj$ mvn install
[INFO] Scanning for project
hello everybody,
I am very new in using and installing maven. When I try to mvn install maven
in directory ns-allinone-2.34/ns-2.34/agentj,
it gives following error;
prabin@prabin-desktop:~$ cd $AGENTJ
prabin@prabin-desktop:~/ns-allinone-2.34/ns-2.34/agentj$ mvn install
[INFO] Scanning for project
Hi All,
I have written pom.xml for auto deployment process between hudson and
deployment servers.
The script which i return its working perfectly i can see the application in
web logic server. The application has been deployed in the web logic server.
No issues in that.
All the remaining task is
21 matches
Mail list logo