> WIthout thinking about it, I've always assumed that, if I tell shade to
> replace the final artifact with the shaded output, that somehow the d-r-pom
> would become 'the pom' for the benefit of consumers. And it does end up in
> the rep. But the pom in the jar's META-INF seems to be the original.
WIthout thinking about it, I've always assumed that, if I tell shade to
replace the final artifact with the shaded output, that somehow the d-r-pom
would become 'the pom' for the benefit of consumers. And it does end up in
the rep. But the pom in the jar's META-INF seems to be the original.
