> Am I going insane, is this a bug in Maven, or is the documentation wrong?
>
> Is there some other way to escape the filtering?
Generally, this should work. Did you specify the escapeString
configuration [1]? What version of plugins etc are you using?
[1]
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-r
I think you have to define the escape character in the configuration.
-Todd
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 8:13 PM, Eric Kolotyluk wrote:
>
> According to http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-filtering/ I can define
>
>
> \${project.build.directory}
>
>
> and I should expect to see
>
> ${project.bu
> Is there a chance that instead of managing the dependencies, I will just add
> the USER LIBRARY I have created on Eclipse?
I don't really understand the question. Provide more context and
details in what you are doing vs what you expect. Also be clear if you
are using M2E or command-line Maven a
Eric-
Its friday nite most "normal people" are now engaging in insane activity called
'having fun'
i dont know what you have setup in environment variables so:
change
\${project.build.directory}
to
BaseFolderForYourProject
HTH
Martin-
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 17:13:04 -0700
> From: e...@kolo
Dan-
lib entries in Eclipse generated .classpath will give your version/artifact for
your dependencies:
...
HTH
Martin
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Diese Nachricht
Hello,
Is there a chance that instead of managing the dependencies, I will just add
the USER LIBRARY I have created on Eclipse?
Best Regards,
Dan
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/USER-LIBRARIES-tp5790481.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive a
According to http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-filtering/ I can define
\${project.build.directory}
and I should expect to see
${project.build.directory}
when the property projectBuildDirectory is used, but instead I get
\D:\Users\Eric\Software\Project\Repositories\csharp-windows-elevate\
Li-
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html#class_dependencySet
maven-assembly-plugin
log4j:log4j
< /dependencySets>
although it might be easier to put into
${project.basedir}/resources/assemblies/depende
Hi Li,
> seems very complicated
Well, assembly makes the simple easy, and the difficult possible. That is,
if all you want is to lump some JARs together, you can use the
preconfigured assembly descriptor. But as soon as you want to do something
custom, you have to create a custom descriptor. It t
Just to follow up, Russel, the .git is incorrect in the element,
and leads to problems when using
com.github.github
site-maven-plugin
Cheers, Eric
On 3/19/2014 12:06 PM, Russell Gold wrote:
HI Eric, I think you are missing the “.git” extensions in your urls. Here’s the
ones I use.
Hello Li Li,
you might take a look at the maven-shade-plugin as well, which is easier to
use IMO.
Regards
Mirko
--
Sent from my mobile
On Apr 4, 2014 3:20 AM, "Li Li" wrote:
> I want to make it runnable simply by java -jar xxx.jar
> build jars will copy all other dependencys
>
> On Thu, Apr 3,
OK, the problem was in
https://github.com/kolotyluk/java-file-utilities.git
scm:git:https://github.com/kolotyluk/java-file-utilities.git
scm:git:https://github.com/kolotyluk/java-file-utilities.git
HEAD
where had .git in it. The fix was
https://github.com/kolotyluk/java-file-utili
Hi,
it would be really nice having a test case which reproduces the wrong
behaviour ...
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
On 4/3/14 2:25 AM, Mark Eggers wrote:
Folks,
I've gotten my classifier artifact to build and install in our local
repository. Specifying the classifier gets the appropriat
There is a *very* hacky way... I hesitate to suggest it... but as you seem
stuck!
Your "delete" mojo can take a wander through the dependency tree and record
the details of all dependencies from the tree that will be affected by the
deleting. You will need to do this for the entire set of reactor
You're very likely to send some day an old version of a false releases,
actually a snapshot, to production with this technique.
I guess you should at least send a mail to some managers to explain things
are going to go wrong some day. At least you will have taken your
responsibility and they can't
Christian, you have no idea how much I wish this were a possibility, but
this is the way the company has handled things for years.
Changing this behavior would mean a revolution in their understanding,
and I sure do not want to start one just yet. :)
There is a much cooler way to do it actually
16 matches
Mail list logo
