> Tried making my top-level module dependent on all the others
Don't! That does not make any logical sense.
> Checked in on xalan-java branch xalan-java-mvn-refactored
Please always provide a link. I have no idea where to find your project.
To you, that might be obvious. to others, it is not.
-
Thanks Tamás!
Eric
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:24 AM Tamás Cservenák
wrote:
> It changed domain
>
> https://blog.soebes.io/posts/2017/04/2017-04-02-maven-pom-files-without-a-version-in-it/
>
> HTH
> T
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:19 PM Eric B wrote:
>
> > Many years ago Karl Heinz Marbaise had
Tried making my top-level module dependent on all the others so the
assembly invoked there would run last. Unfortunately, it seems the
dependencies are inherited to all the children, and Maven complains
about dependencies upon self.
I presume there's an obvious idiom that I just haven't yet be
Oh. I probably forgot to set dependencies. Checking.
On 11/10/2023 9:35 PM, Joseph Kessselman wrote:
I'm trying to adapt the examples given at
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin to work with my
multi-module project.
Source was mostly easy -- I copied the into a file, twe
I'm trying to adapt the examples given at
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin to work with my
multi-module project.
Source was mostly easy -- I copied the into a file, tweaked
its excludes (still wish it picked up the .gitinclude automagically),
and it worked. I'd still li
BTW you can also write the version to the manifest and then use
class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion() like I did here:
https://github.com/ecki/et-otp/blob/663228f2b6ad7d3f20aad04ca5f675b49662a78c/src/main/java/net/eckenfels/etotp/GUI.java#L64
This only requires addDefaultImplementationEn
I think there are two issues with this, first of all git is not the only SCM,
so why prefer it’s file.
But secondly it is very common that binary result artifacts are git ignored and
exactly the stuff you want to package. For example target/
Are you thinking about -src archives, only?
Having
... Actually, correction -- not the jar plugin, the assembly plugin. (sigh)
On 11/10/2023 1:42 PM, Joseph Kessselman wrote:
(Or, equivalently be told to take exclude list from a file in .gitignore
syntax and then be told .gitignore was that file.)
If not, I'd consider that worth adding.
(Or, equivalently be told to take exclude list from a file in .gitignore
syntax and then be told .gitignore was that file.)
If not, I'd consider that worth adding.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
Fo
It changed domain
https://blog.soebes.io/posts/2017/04/2017-04-02-maven-pom-files-without-a-version-in-it/
HTH
T
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:19 PM Eric B wrote:
> Many years ago Karl Heinz Marbaise had written a blog about the beginning
> of Maven 3.5's support of CI versioning numbers with the s
Many years ago Karl Heinz Marbaise had written a blog about the beginning
of Maven 3.5's support of CI versioning numbers with the specific
parameters that are interpolated by maven. I always used to refer new
developers to that blog that were trying to understand the complexities of
using Maven a
11 matches
Mail list logo
