On 13-07-2003 23:56, "Sean Radford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And where are these *.cache files located?
>
> Looked in:
>
> 1. MAVEN_HOME/
> 2. ~/.maven/
> 3. /tmp
>
> (I'm running on linux by the way)
>
in ${MAVEN_HOME}/plugins
m.
---
On 09-07-2003 05:45, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either I am missing something obvious, there is a bug
> in Maven-1.0-beta-9, or that document is incomplete in
> its description on how to setup a remote repository.
> Regardless, I have already reviewed that document
> multiple
On 02-07-2003 16:36, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> In your project.xml define the ressource you want to include in your
> classpath :
>
>
>
>
> ${basedir}/src/conf
>
> *.properties
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> And you just ha
jDepend allows on to define a jdepend.properties file to disable the count
of e.g. java.* classes. It demands that this properties file is either in
the classpath or in the user's home directory.
It works for me if I place the properties file in my home directory, but I'd
rather place it somewhere
On 02-07-2003 15:37, "Christopher Prince" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the problem occurs when maven attempts to compile the junit test code. The
> compile fails because it
> cannot find the junit jar. So I added in a dependency
>
>
>
> juint
> juint
> 3.8.1
>
>
> and this di
How do I make the (optional) ant task 'p4sync' work under Maven 1.0 beta 9?
This task requires the oro library. For ant I have to drop this jar-file
into the lib directory. What is the corresponding place under maven ?
thanks in advance,
Marc
I add to add the following dependencies (using 1.2b3)
jboss
jboss-j2ee
3.0.6
servletapi
2.3
regards
Marc
-
To unsubscr
On 11-06-2003 14:27, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've read the "Documentation update" thread, which ended in Jan 2003.
> I'm running 1.0 b9, but apparently there is no change in the behaviour of
> the war name generation. It's still ${pom.id}.war.
> Is the patch mentioned ther
I've read the "Documentation update" thread, which ended in Jan 2003.
I'm running 1.0 b9, but apparently there is no change in the behaviour of
the war name generation. It's still ${pom.id}.war.
Is the patch mentioned there supposed to allow one to specify a war name
with a version number ?
thanks
