We upgraded from 2.3.34 to 2.3.35 in one of our applications, but although
the upgrade is described as backwards compatible, we found a problem in the
UI.
The simplified example is as follows.
*Given* a JSP with:
foo
bar
*And *scopesValues was
Hey Thorsten,
Did you manage to figure out this? I've just asked the exact same thing in
m2e's mailing list!
Cheers,
Miguel Almeida
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Thorsten Heit thorsten.h...@vkb.de wrote:
Hi,
today I decided to give Webby a try. Apart from Webby Core I also
installed
On a correction to my previous emai: the dependency:analyze was run on
Project Foo, not ProjectX.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Miguel Almeida
migueldealme...@gmail.comwrote:
I have a multi-module project (one of the modules is a WAR). Some modules
depend on projectX, and some
).
*
Running the goal package locally doesn't yield the same problem - only one
snapshot is packaged in the war, as expected.
I've tried to figure out why this could be happening, but I am lost. Does
anyone have an idea of what could be wrong?
Cheers,
Miguel Almeida
[1]
[INFO] --- maven-dependency
machines) and how Cobertura is affected by this (I read that
code coverage won't take into consideration the failsafe tests, even though
it should in the CI server), but I'll tackle one problem at a time.
I appreciate your help,
Miguel Almeida
-jar dependency? Even if I installed/deployed, maven would probably be
out of sync, retrieving the previously installed test-jar and not the one in
the current workspace.
Thanks in advance for your clarification,
Miguel Almeida
*[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site
goal separately and even move it to the CI system: it delays quick feedback
to the developer locally anyway.
Miguel Almeida
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Cobertura-and-Surefire-td3338334.html
On 26
twice (eg, I found two string matches of Running
org.iwrs.web.IndexActionTest).
To reduce total goal time, can *tests run once and produce surefire and
cobertura reports*?
Thank you,
Miguel Almeida
[1]
plugins
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
at 11:17, Miguel Almeida migueldealme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
In
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Maven-Problem-in-including-excluding-some-java-packages-in-the-src-while-creating-a-jar-td2641836.htmlAnders
strongly discouraged having more than one package per project.
However, I
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
No, he means (correct me if I am wrong) that you should have a war for
each web application you have. Since you have *one* web application,
one war is ok.
Configuration like IP addresses, ports, etc. should
Anders,
I think I understand what you mean, but it doesn't seem to be very different
from the current approach.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote:
Antonio is right.
This has been discussed several times. Search the archive for many examples
of doing
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote:
Ok, I see where we misunderstand each other.
What you want to do is to build just one war. This war should not include
any environment configuration at all! Environment dependent configuration
should be handled outside
? Although I follow your logic, this approach
seems cumbersome and I'm not even sure how I'd implement it.
Can you share your thoughts on how the best Maven approach would be?
Thank you for your help,
Miguel Almeida
13 matches
Mail list logo
