Re: doxia-book-maven-plugin - How do I bind book sections to markdown files?

2012-08-17 Thread Oliver Schrenk
a pdf parallel to the site, you should > rather use the maven-pdf-plugin [1] instead of the > doxia-book-maven-plugin. It works better in my experience. > > HTH, > -Lukas > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-pdf-plugin/ > > > Oliver Schrenk wrote: >> Hi, >

doxia-book-maven-plugin - How do I bind book sections to markdown files?

2012-08-10 Thread Oliver Schrenk
t that matches section with id=01-json.md. -> [Help1] Which is to be expected as I have no clue on how to map my markdown files to the various chapters and sections and I can't find any infos on it. Does anybody know how to do this? Best regards Oliver Schrenk

Re: maven-shade-plugin, minifyJar removes classes used in Class.forName(...)

2011-12-13 Thread Oliver Schrenk
ects (or subprojects) > one to build a shaded minified jar then another one depending on the first > one just shading the drivers and the result jar from the first shade > operation without minifyJar this time? > > -Original Message- > From: Oliver Schrenk [mailto:oliver.schr

Re: maven-shade-plugin, minifyJar removes classes used in Class.forName(...)

2011-12-13 Thread Oliver Schrenk
erError e) { > // ignore > } > > :-P > > On 13 December 2011 12:04, Oliver Schrenk wrote: >> Hej, >> >> I'm using the maven-shade-plugin to create an executable jar. The number of >> included jars blows the final jar over 10+ MB. Using the `minifyJar` >&

maven-shade-plugin, minifyJar removes classes used in Class.forName(...)

2011-12-13 Thread Oliver Schrenk
classes. How can I minify the shaded jar and still include the database driver? Best regards Oliver Schrenk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Keeping the executable bit on shell scripts when testing

2011-01-27 Thread Oliver Schrenk
POSIX file permissions Am 27.01.2011 um 19:42 schrieb Haszlakiewicz, Eric: >> -Original Message- >> From: Oliver Schrenk [mailto:oliver.schr...@gmail.com] >> >> It's a good idea but not suitable for my case. If I'm calling sh, the real >> script would b

Re: Keeping the executable bit on shell scripts when testing

2011-01-26 Thread Oliver Schrenk
>> sh foo.sh >> >> and not >> >> foo.sh >> >> - Stephen >> >> --- >> Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense >> words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the >>

Keeping the executable bit on shell scripts when testing

2011-01-26 Thread Oliver Schrenk
to keep them? Or any other ideas? Best regards Oliver Schrenk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org