Hi Rodrigo,
Thanks for your reply,
Mmmm, then, why do you want to stop transitivity? If you depend on a war
module which depends on implJarModule at runtime, then your final module
will also depend on it. Maybe your final module includes another
implementation?
It's not rely that I want to s
Mmmm, then, why do you want to stop transitivity? If you depend on a war
module which depends on implJarModule at runtime, then your final module
will also depend on it. Maybe your final module includes another
implementation?
Anyway, I guess what you need is to declare the dependency as:
...
Thanks Rodrigo for your reply.
I think "provided" is the right value for this
I prefer to say "provided" is the best solution (compared with the others) but
not the right.
Why ? Because if you need my warModule, you will see that it has a
dependency to implJarModule with the provided scope.
So
I think "provided" is the right value for this
Regards
Rémy Sanlaville wrote:
> Anybody can help me (isn't it clear enough) ?
> any thoughts?
>
> Rémy
>
--
---
GRID SYSTEMS, S.A. Rodrigo Ruiz
Parc Bit - Edificio 17
Anybody can help me (isn't it clear enough) ?
any thoughts?
Rémy
Hi,
I would like to have your advice for this problem.
Context:
I have a multi-modules project :
project
|
| earModule (depends on warModule, apiJarModule, implJarModule)
|
| warModule (depends on apiJar, apiJarModule, implJarModule,
mockImplJarModule and spring)
|
|-