Re: [m2] Application Assembly

2005-08-16 Thread Daniel Krisher
Hmm, I would definitely not want an un-archived assembly directory to be installed/deployed to a repository, this was really just intended as a development-time tool. I am still very new to Maven, so I'm not quite sure of the best approach here. I will take another look. Maybe my patch should

Re: [m2] Application Assembly

2005-08-15 Thread Daniel Krisher
See MNG-735 for a patch that adds support for a 'directory' archive type On 8/14/05, Daniel Krisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the quick response... I've already looked at the assembly plugin source, I'll put together a patch tonight or tomorrow morning and submit it along with a

Re: [m2] Application Assembly

2005-08-15 Thread Jason Grant
Hi Daniel, FYI, I have assembly patches sitting in Jira, and awaiting publication to svn: 1) MNG-723: Adds an 'unpack' goal that unpacks all project dependencies (jars and zips) into the working directory. 2) MNG-483: Attaches all assemblies as project artifacts, so that they get installed

[m2] Application Assembly

2005-08-14 Thread Daniel Krisher
I recently made the jump from Ant to Maven (2.0-beta snapshot), and I must say that I am very impressed. Having never used Maven before, it only took a couple of hours to set up a fairly complex multi-module build process. We had spent a significant amount of time attempting to engineer a

Re: [m2] Application Assembly

2005-08-14 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Daniel, This sounds like a reasonable request. There are two things I can think of: - create an assembly type that is just the directory - pass a flag to the assembly plugin to not create the archive The second would be preferable if at some point you intend to use the archive to distribute.

Re: [m2] Application Assembly

2005-08-14 Thread Daniel Krisher
Thanks for the quick response... I've already looked at the assembly plugin source, I'll put together a patch tonight or tomorrow morning and submit it along with a JIRA request. Thanks Dan Krisher On 8/14/05, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Daniel, This sounds like a