Re: 2.0.9->2.1.0 change/regression in relocation WARNING?

2009-08-02 Thread javabrett
javabrett wrote: > > Further, a build in m2eclipse 0.9.8.200905041414 using the Embedded mvn > (which version is that?), _does_ throw the WARNING (which is what I want). > > Does anyone know how these warnings are supposed to work and whether their > behaviour has changed recently? It's a sha

Re: 2.0.9->2.1.0 change/regression in relocation WARNING?

2009-07-13 Thread javabrett
Further, a build in m2eclipse 0.9.8.200905041414 using the Embedded mvn (which version is that?), _does_ throw the WARNING (which is what I want). Does anyone know how these warnings are supposed to work and whether their behaviour has changed recently? It's a shame if you can't force a relocati

2.0.9->2.1.0 change/regression in relocation WARNING?

2009-07-07 Thread Brett Randall
Hi, I'm trying to understand if there is a regression or deliberate change in WARNING reporting of relocated artifacts between Maven 2.0.9 and Maven 2.1.0. I tested with a well-known relocated artifact servletapi:servletapi:2.3 which is relocated to javax.servlet:servlet-api:2.3. Test POM a