RE: About Javadoc links

2003-08-22 Thread Martin Skopp
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:23, Martin Skopp wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 12:06, Simon Matic Langford wrote: we'd actually like to do the offline links even when online, as javadoc can't go through a proxy. I have raised JIRA Issue MAVEN-694

RE: About Javadoc links

2003-08-22 Thread dion
Fixed in CVS now. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Martin Skopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/08/2003 06:33:23 PM: On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:23, Martin Skopp wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 12:06, Simon Matic Langford wrote: we'd actually

Re: About Javadoc links

2003-08-19 Thread Martin Skopp
Hi Jeff, On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 21:03, Jefferson K. French wrote: Assuming my guess is correct, I guess that depends on whether or not self-referencing properties are supported in Maven. Are they supported in Ant? I've never tried. Don't know whether it works in Ant or not. But have created

RE: About Javadoc links

2003-08-19 Thread Martin Skopp
Paul, Simon and dIon, On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 12:06, Simon Matic Langford wrote: we'd actually like to do the offline links even when online, as javadoc can't go through a proxy. I have raised JIRA Issue MAVEN-694 Please check and/or comment on

Re: About Javadoc links

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Martin Skopp wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 11:26, Paul Libbrecht wrote: But having one property is a problem: it's not extensible, or do I mistake? extensible in which direction? Sorry, I still didn't got the point of it Well, at least in the sense a user's build.xml could overwrite or

Re: About Javadoc links

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Simon Matic Langford wrote: are we talking about creating links to javadocs in a different location if running offline? or are we talking about creating links to online javadocs using a local package-list file, as is necessary when sitting behind an authenticating proxy? or both? I think both.

RE: About Javadoc links

2003-08-14 Thread Simon Matic Langford
of The PCMS Group plc and should not be taken as authority to carry out any instruction contained. -Original Message- From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 August 2003 10:27 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: About Javadoc links But having one property is a problem

Re: About Javadoc links

2003-08-14 Thread Jefferson K. French
I'm not one of the deveopers, but it looks like an infinite loop trying to resolve the self-referential javadoc.offlineurl property. Maybe you need two properties: javadoc.offlineurl javadoc.offlineurl.local Just a thought. Jeff On 14 Aug 2003, at 16:45:50 [GMT +0200] Martin Skopp

Re: About Javadoc links

2003-08-14 Thread Jefferson K. French
Assuming my guess is correct, I guess that depends on whether or not self-referencing properties are supported in Maven. Are they supported in Ant? I've never tried. On 14 Aug 2003, at 17:43:20 [GMT +0200] Martin Skopp wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 16:57, Jefferson K. French wrote: I'm not one

Re: About Javadoc links

2003-08-14 Thread Martin Skopp
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:20, Paul Libbrecht wrote: Martin Skopp wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 11:26, Paul Libbrecht wrote: But having one property is a problem: it's not extensible, or do I mistake? extensible in which direction? Sorry, I still didn't got the point of it

Re: About Javadoc links

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Martin Skopp wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:20, Paul Libbrecht wrote: Martin Skopp wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 11:26, Paul Libbrecht wrote: But having one property is a problem: it's not extensible, or do I mistake? extensible in which direction? Sorry, I still didn't got the point of

RE: About Javadoc links

2003-08-14 Thread dion
to carry out any instruction contained. -Original Message- From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 August 2003 10:27 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: About Javadoc links But having one property is a problem: it's not extensible, or do I mistake