Benchmark M1 - M2

2007-04-19 Thread emerson cargnin
Does any one has a comparative relating to speed and memory comsumption of M1 and M2. I'm getting loads of outof memory errors in M1 and as I'm trying to convince the porting to M2 this would be a good point. Thanks a lot emerson -

Re: Benchmark M1 - M2

2007-04-19 Thread Jeff Jensen
What version of m1 are you using? What plugin(s) encounters the OOM? Many plugins have JVM settings property to enable setting the max mem, e.g. -Xmx1024m. It is expected to set this for sizable codebases. Quoting emerson cargnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Does any one has a comparative relating

Re: Benchmark M1 - M2

2007-04-19 Thread emerson cargnin
Hi there It happens when i create a site for a multiproject of about 17 project, during a compilation of one of the projects. [exec] BUILD FAILED [exec] File.. /subversion/users/svnclient/.maven/cache/maven-multiproject-plugin-1.3.1/plugin.jelly [exec] Element... maven:reactor

Re: Benchmark M1 - M2

2007-04-19 Thread emerson cargnin
sorry, i forgot, we use manen 1.0.2, e i configured the OPT like MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx2600m thanks On 19/04/07, emerson cargnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there It happens when i create a site for a multiproject of about 17 project, during a compilation of one of the projects. [exec] BUILD

Re: Benchmark M1 - M2

2007-04-19 Thread Jeff Jensen
1. The problem with only using MAVEN_OPTS is that when plugins fork to run a task in a separate JVM, the MAVEN_OPTS is not used. This is where we need to set the JVM property for the plugin that needs the memory. I suggest tracking to the plugin that causes the problem, and set its JVM property i

Re: Benchmark M1 - M2

2007-04-19 Thread emerson cargnin
Thanks Jeff, I'll give it a try On 19/04/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1. The problem with only using MAVEN_OPTS is that when plugins fork to run a task in a separate JVM, the MAVEN_OPTS is not used. This is where we need to set the JVM property for the plugin that needs the memory