I've been taking a first look at documentation for the Failsafe plugin. It
looked straightforward until I got to the part that discussed Jetty. I
found the Jetty section confusing, as it seems to imply that Jetty is
required to Failsafe. I hope I'm misunderstanding it, and that Failsafe
can be
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Richard W. Adams wrote:
> I've been taking a first look at documentation for the Failsafe plugin. It
> looked straightforward until I got to the part that discussed Jetty. I
> found the Jetty section confusing, as it seems to imply that Jetty is
> required to Fai
/failsafe-summary-1.xml
1 0 0
0
does this conform to your understanding?
Martin __
> To: users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Does Failsafe Require Jetty?
> From: rwada...@up.com
> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:35:41 -0500
>
> I've b
Failsafe does not require jetty. If your integration tests require that
your application be deployed to a servlet container - such as jetty - and
you do not want to have your tests manage the lifecycle of that container,
then you will require failsafe so that you can have maven manage starting
up a
> From: stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:33:34 +0100
> Subject: Re: Does Failsafe Require Jetty?
> To: users@maven.apache.org
>
> Failsafe does not require jetty. If your integration tests require that
> your application be deployed to a servle
m you can just use
surefire
On 29 August 2016 at 14:09, Martin Gainty wrote:
>
>
> > From: stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> > Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:33:34 +0100
> > Subject: Re: Does Failsafe Require Jetty?
> > To: users@maven.apache.org
> >
> > Fails
