Never used optional.
What classes were missing when you used provided?
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html
mentions that the transitive dependencies are not available if you use
provided.
You will have to add any dependencies that your code
If there are specific suggestions or questions about the maven blog
articles (from anyone), I would be grateful to have them.
They were written rather quickly to explain a technique that we found
useful. People may have to read more than one of the maven articles to
get the gist of what we do.
I'm afraid I don't understand your advice :(
Sorry
maybe you have example project available?
Or maybe you can take a look at my project
parent
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/pom.xml?revision=HEADview=markup
util
I don't have time to look at code and projects for free.
If you need consulting to move forward, there are others here that do
Maven for a business and can help you better than I can.
Have you tried making the red5 scope provided.
What does this do to your build?
Does it get eliminate the red5
Thanks for your time
I have started with making red5 provided but the build failed since
necessary classes were not found.
May be is there any way to provide dependency before build ...
If not I will try to create optional dependency and another one subproject,
not sure if it will work.
I
Make the dependency optional seems to help :)
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Maxim Solodovnik solomax...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for your time
I have started with making red5 provided but the build failed since
necessary classes were not found.
May be is there any way to provide dependency
Can you describe the forking Maven problem in more detail.
What does it do that you don't want and what does it not do that you need.
Is there anything about your build that is different from the thousands
of projects that use Maven to build Tomcat applications?
Have you looked at using Maven
Hello Ron,
I'll take a look at izPack as an alternative to assembly plugin (which
seems to be able to create artifact similar to the current being created by
ant)
Currently I'm trying to build all jars/war/swf files need to be packed (by
assembly plugin or izPack)
Here is the stripped output of
Additional question:
Is it possible to exclude compile time dependency (with all transitive
sub-dependencies)
form war libraries? (without listing libraries one by one)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Maxim Solodovnik solomax...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Ron,
I'll take a look at izPack as an
Where will the transitive dependencies come from?
There may be ways to do what you want.
Ron
On 29/04/2014 1:44 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Additional question:
Is it possible to exclude compile time dependency (with all transitive
sub-dependencies)
form war libraries? (without listing
Here is the structure:
Openmeetings Util project has compile time dependency Red5 server
Almost all other projects are dependent on Openmeetings Util and Red5
server (compile time)
But When I'm creating war file in Openmeetings Web project I need to
remove Red5 server and all it dependencies
So, as far as Maven is concerned, Red5 is scope provided.
You want it to reference it for compiling but should not put its classes
in the jar or war since you are going to sneak it into the package
without Maven noticing.
Pretty standard problem. We make a lot of aggregation jars that are
On 30 April 2014 11:54, Maxim Solodovnik solomax...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the structure:
Openmeetings Util project has compile time dependency Red5 server
Almost all other projects are dependent on Openmeetings Util and Red5
server (compile time)
But When I'm creating war file in
13 matches
Mail list logo
