Hi, I was able to overcome this problem by deploying continuum war on tomcat. Just browsing through the continuum bug list i came across some bug that was related to jvm and jetty, so just as a wild guess i thought of doing it. And on tomcat continuum is running fine. I know there is nothing to infer from this fluke but yeah it worked for me.
Regards, Hemant Malik On Dec 19, 2007 7:58 PM, Boeckli, Dominique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i had same problem and figured out that is was deadlock due to a log4j bug > (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43568): > > This deadlock happens under following cases: > > - Proximity RC9 and Continuum-1.1 on same server > - both has a scheduled task at the same time (a purge task for proximity > and build task for continuum). > > There's no fix for this bug but you can reduce the probability that is > happens: > - don't set start time for proximity and continuum task at the same time. > > brgds > > Dominique > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hemant Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 08:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: JVM Appears to be hung > > Actually the problem for me is that I don't want the jvm to be killed. > After taking sometime the Apache continuum Console restarts the JVM telling > " JVM appears to be hung...... " which is killing my enqueued processes and > thus losing the schedule :( > > Hemant > > On Dec 3, 2007 12:35 PM, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I had one case where continuum's jvm spined. I had to killl the jvm > > and restart continuum. > > > > my system is jvm 1.5, windows running in non service mode. > > > > > > -D > > > > On Dec 2, 2007 10:13 PM, Hemant Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Has anyone come across a similar problem? I am not able to cope up > > > with > > the > > > "JVM appears to be hung" error. Somebody kindly please help. > > > Is this a bug or am I lacking somewhere? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Hemant Malik > > > > > > > > > On Nov 29, 2007 9:30 PM, Hemant Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I tried increasing the PermSize and Heap Size, but no effect. > > > > > > > > Hemant > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 29, 2007 9:19 PM, Hemant Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > My OS is Windows XP with SP2. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Hemant Malik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 29, 2007 8:58 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > What is your OS? > > > > > > > > > > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > > > > > > > Hemant Malik a écrit : > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > We are in the phase of adapting to the Continuum as CI tool > > > > > > > here > > at > > > > > > our > > > > > > > organization.We are using the latest version available on > > Continuum > > > > > > Home. > > > > > > > For the testing purposes the Continuum worked beautifully > > > > > > > but > > with > > > > > > actual > > > > > > > project from CVS, its taking quite a bit of time, after the > > checkout > > > > > > when I > > > > > > > give the build command, after waiting for certain time "JVM > > appears > > > > > > to be > > > > > > > hung" error comes and the JVM gets restarted, hence I loose > > > > > > > the > > > > > > earlier > > > > > > > progress in the build. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could please someone help out as if it is a configuration > > problem > > > > > > somewhere > > > > > > > or anything more serious? > > > > > > > The exact error is : > > > > > > > "* > > > > > > > ERROR | wrapper | 2007/11/29 19:17:18 | JVM appears hung: > > Timed > > > > > > out > > > > > > > waiting for signal from JVM. > > > > > > > ERROR | wrapper | 2007/11/29 19:17:18 | JVM did not exit > > > > > > > on > > > > > > request, > > > > > > > terminated > > > > > > > STATUS | wrapper | 2007/11/29 19:17:24 | Launching a > > > > > > > JVM...* " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Hemant Malik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are working with : > > > > > > > 1) Maven 2.0.7 > > > > > > > 2) CVS > > > > > > > 3) Continuum 1.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >