Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread stéphane bouchet
Shinobu Kawai a écrit : Hi stéphane, The patch submitted works great, and this is exactly what i needed. :) Terrific! Just looked up the word "terrific" in my dictionary.com. It means either "very good" or "very bad". Strange English word... Anyways, I meant the "very good" one. ;-) cf. htt

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread Shinobu Kawai
Hi stéphane, > >>The patch submitted works great, and this is exactly what i needed. :) > > > > Terrific! Just looked up the word "terrific" in my dictionary.com. It means either "very good" or "very bad". Strange English word... Anyways, I meant the "very good" one. ;-) cf. http://dictio

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
It's reopened. All patches are welcome. Emmanuel - Original Message - From: "Jörg Schaible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:27 PM Subject: RE: Jcoverage exclusion list [snip] >

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
- Original Message - From: "stéphane bouchet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 2:52 PM Subject: Re: Jcoverage exclusion list > Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : > > >> > >>

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread stéphane bouchet
Shinobu Kawai a écrit : Hi stéphane, The patch submitted works great, and this is exactly what i needed. :) Terrific! Humm, yes, it is a bad idea to exclude some files from coverage, because it produce a non-realistic report . but in the same time, there is some classes you know they will NEVER

RE: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread Jörg Schaible
[snip] > > In order to work correctly, i had to delete myself the "jcoverage.ser" > file, because it contains some reference to the files i > wanted to exclude. > > Could it be possible to delete this file when the "clean" > goal is called ? Look at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJCOVERAGE-11

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread Shinobu Kawai
Hi stéphane, > The patch submitted works great, and this is exactly what i needed. :) Terrific! > In order to work correctly, i had to delete myself the "jcoverage.ser" > file, because it contains some reference to the files i wanted to exclude. > > Could it be possible to delete this file whe

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread stéphane bouchet
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : You can use this : and define maven.jcoverage.instrumentation.excludes like this: maven.jcoverage.instrumentation.excludes=**/*Tests.class,**/*Aspect.class Can you test this little patch and send us the result. If it's ok, I'll commit it. Emmanuel --

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
> > > > You can use this : and define maven.jcoverage.instrumentation.excludes like this: maven.jcoverage.instrumentation.excludes=**/*Tests.class,**/*Aspect.class Can you test this little patch and send us the result. If it's ok, I'll commit it. Emmanuel

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread Shinobu Kawai
> As you can see, it has to follow Ant's FileSet's exclude convention, > which you can consult at: > http://localhost/java/apache-ant-1.6.2/docs/manual/dirtasks.html#patterns Oops, this one only works for me. The global URI is http://ant.apache.org/manual/dirtasks.html#patterns Sorry abou

Re: Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread Shinobu Kawai
Hi stéphane, > I'm using maven 1.0 and jcoverage plugin 1.0.7. Good to hear that. I use them, too. > I would like to exclude some classes from jcoverage and i used the > maven.jcoverage.instrumentation.excludes property. > > the problem is that i would like to exclude differents files : > *Te

Jcoverage exclusion list

2004-08-17 Thread stéphane bouchet
Hi, I'm using maven 1.0 and jcoverage plugin 1.0.7. I would like to exclude some classes from jcoverage and i used the maven.jcoverage.instrumentation.excludes property. the problem is that i would like to exclude differents files : *Tests.class and *Aspect.class . It's working if i put only one