Re: Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-10 Thread Dion Gillard
And for what it's worth, Jelly is and will continue to be maintained separately from Maven. On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:03:54 -0400, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Marmalade is hosted at http://marmalade.codehaus.org. You should find > CVS information as well as a link to recent sour

Re: Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-10 Thread John Casey
Hi, Marmalade is hosted at http://marmalade.codehaus.org. You should find CVS information as well as a link to recent source drops at that site. I named it marmalade so people would get the relationship to jelly, without thinking it was the next logical iteration of jelly. This is a clean impleme

Re: Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-08 Thread Nathan Coast
ed release date for Maven 2.0? Regards, Earl Hokens 312-322-4173 (desk) 312-404-2718 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/07/2004 02:52 PM Please respond to "Maven Users List" To: Maven Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc:

Re: Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 16:50, Leif Nelson wrote: > So I gotta ask.. What's so bad about Groovy? :-) I'm not going to answer that question in a public forum. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maven.apache.org happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it wil

Re: Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-07 Thread Leif Nelson
So I gotta ask.. What's so bad about Groovy? :-) I'd really like to know what makes it unsuitable for your use. And, I've never used any of the options you describe except the beanshell. Thanks, --Leif Some other options are Beanshell, Janino and possibly JRuby. Don't even ask about Groovy

Re: Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-07 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:37 PM Subject: Re: Maven 2.0 question > Is there a planned release date for Maven 2.0? No precise date. The next year. > >

Re: Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-07 Thread Earl . Hokens
TECTED]> cc: Subject:Re: Maven 2.0 question On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:47, STRAYER, JON (SBCSI) wrote: > Is Jelly still the scripting language for Maven 2.0? The short answer is no. The long answer is that there will be several options for scripting plugins: the XML scri

Re: Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 14:47, STRAYER, JON (SBCSI) wrote: > Is Jelly still the scripting language for Maven 2.0? The short answer is no. The long answer is that there will be several options for scripting plugins: the XML scripting option is something called Marmalade which is something like Jell

Maven 2.0 question

2004-10-07 Thread STRAYER, JON \(SBCSI\)
Is Jelly still the scripting language for Maven 2.0? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]