Sorry wrong link... you want http://bit.ly/18wuQUc
On 28 May 2013 15:41, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> http://bit.ly/18wuJIj
>
>
> On 28 May 2013 15:33, Alberto Ivo wrote:
>
>> Any idea on JBoss 7 AS?
>>
>>
>> Ivo
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Stephen Connolly <
>> stephen.alan.conno..
http://bit.ly/18wuJIj
On 28 May 2013 15:33, Alberto Ivo wrote:
> Any idea on JBoss 7 AS?
>
>
> Ivo
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > jetty's is more fun... though you can hack it with one of the override
> > methods
> >
>
Any idea on JBoss 7 AS?
Ivo
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> jetty's is more fun... though you can hack it with one of the override
> methods
>
>
> On 28 May 2013 15:05, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 02:49:26PM
jetty's is more fun... though you can hack it with one of the override
methods
On 28 May 2013 15:05, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 02:49:26PM +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> > On 28 May 2013 14:37, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:20:15PM -0300, Alberto
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 02:49:26PM +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> On 28 May 2013 14:37, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:20:15PM -0300, Alberto Ivo wrote:
> > > The differences between the web.xml is
> > >
> > >
> > > javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE
> > > *Development | Producti
On 28/05/2013 9:46 AM, Alberto Ivo wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:20:15PM -0300, Alberto Ivo wrote:
The differences between the web.xml is
javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE
*Development | Production*
Shouldn't that sort of information be
On 28 May 2013 14:37, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:20:15PM -0300, Alberto Ivo wrote:
> > The differences between the web.xml is
> >
> >
> > javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE
> > *Development | Production*
> >
>
> Shouldn't that sort of information be supplied by the container rathe
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:20:15PM -0300, Alberto Ivo wrote:
> > The differences between the web.xml is
> >
> >
> > javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE
> > *Development | Production*
> >
>
> Shouldn't that sort of information be supplied by the con
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:20:15PM -0300, Alberto Ivo wrote:
> The differences between the web.xml is
>
>
> javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE
> *Development | Production*
>
Shouldn't that sort of information be supplied by the container rather
than baked into the app?
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Pr
Am 2013-05-27 19:37, schrieb Alberto Ivo:
Michael-O, how do you choose what webapp use? Manually?
Please do NOT top post:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Choosing_the_proper_posting_style
Choosing for what?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
Michael-O, how do you choose what webapp use? Manually?
Ivo
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Am 2013-05-27 17:20, schrieb Alberto Ivo:
>
> Hello,
>>
>> I have two different web.xml files. One for Developers and another for
>> Production.
>>
>> Today I m
Am 2013-05-27 17:20, schrieb Alberto Ivo:
Hello,
I have two different web.xml files. One for Developers and another for
Production.
Today I manually rename the file to use in develop enviroment and
production. I would like to know how can I automatize the build using Maven
Profile (or any other
I think my initial idea is somthing like what Russel said. But I don't know
how to do it.
Ivo
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Alberto Ivo wrote:
> The differences between the web.xml is
>
>
> javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE
> *Development | Production*
>
>
> and some tags.
>
>
> Ivo
>
>
> On M
The differences between the web.xml is
javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE
*Development | Production*
and some tags.
Ivo
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Russell Gold wrote:
> OK, *headdesk*. I was dealing with a different problem and thought this
> was the same one. Just ignore what I said.
>
>
OK, *headdesk*. I was dealing with a different problem and thought this was the
same one. Just ignore what I said.
On May 27, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Russell Gold wrote:
> I believe this is quite reasonable. Developers would like to be able to see a
> lot of reports on the code internals. The abili
what I prefer to do is have developers use an on-demand servlet container,
e.g. jetty or tomcat and then configure web.xml overrides for the app when
deployed using e.g. jetty:run or tomcat:run
but YMMV
On 27 May 2013 16:58, Russell Gold wrote:
> I believe this is quite reasonable. Developers
I believe this is quite reasonable. Developers would like to be able to see a
lot of reports on the code internals. The ability to generate those is one of
Maven's strengths; however, users (which I assume is meant by production)
should generally not be given all that information, especially if
> I have two different web.xml files. One for Developers and another for
> Production.
Why? What specifically is different? Can those differences not be
eliminated, to produce one single artifact for all environments?
Wayne
-
To
Hello,
I have two different web.xml files. One for Developers and another for
Production.
Today I manually rename the file to use in develop enviroment and
production. I would like to know how can I automatize the build using Maven
Profile (or any other plugin). Is that possible?
Thanks in advan
19 matches
Mail list logo
