persistence.xml files.
Don't quite know why my confluence is so slow at the Moment ... will have a
look at this tonight.
Chris
Von: John Patrick [nhoj.patr...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Juli 2013 18:50
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Maven and JPA/EclipseLink
Von: John Patrick [nhoj.patr...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Juli 2013 18:50
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Maven and JPA/EclipseLink Configuration...
I'm working on a project that uses JPA EclipseLink, everything started of
fine with Jetty
here knows how
to do so, I would be glad for some Input on this ;-)
Chris
Von: Stephen Connolly [stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013 11:14
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Re: Maven and JPA/EclipseLink Configuration
[stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013 11:14
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Re: Maven and JPA/EclipseLink Configuration...
That looks like a Spring only solution I wonder is there a pure JavaEE
counterpart
On 11 July 2013 09:56, christofer.d...@c-ware.de
christofer.d
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Re: Maven and JPA/EclipseLink Configuration...
That looks like a Spring only solution I wonder is there a pure JavaEE
counterpart
On 11 July 2013 09:56, christofer.d...@c-ware.de
christofer.d...@c-ware.dewrote:
You could have a look at my Wiki article about
On 10 Jul 2013, at 06:05, Baptiste MATHUS bmat...@batmat.net wrote:
If those properties are specific to eclipselink, then I think it's ok and
simpler to just leave them in the persistence.xml even if they're actually
not used when EclipseLink isn't the provider. Then package only one ear.
Well the first thing I would look towards is whether you can use an
application server specific deployment descriptor to tweak the effective
persistence.xml at deployment time.
I am not saying that the above is possible, but if it is, then that is
obviously the way to go as you then can just
Where does an installer fit in this vision?
It seems to me, having installed thousands of programs as a Windows user
and Linux system administrator, that a lot of the discussion about
deployment issues seem to ignore the role of installers (rpm, msi,
izPack, etc.).
They are specifically
Well if it is an interactive installer then it can do the configuration for
you...
But with a JavaEE application you don't know:
1. What application container they have
2. What database they have
3. Where the application container picks up deployed apps
4. How the user wants the app deployed in
On 10/07/2013 10:06 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Well if it is an interactive installer then it can do the
configuration for you...
It needs to be interactive in some way if you want to handle a variety
of environments.
./configure
make
install
(you hope that you don't end up with something
On 10 July 2013 15:52, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
On 10/07/2013 10:06 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Well if it is an interactive installer then it can do the configuration
for you...
It needs to be interactive in some way if you want to handle a variety
of
I agree with a lot of the JCP description of the deployer role.
I also think that they are oriented to a small portion of the deployment
world.
Most of the time the person doing deployments has a third party product
from a vendor and does not have the source code and does not even have
any
I'm working on a project that uses JPA EclipseLink, everything started of
fine with Jetty for developers development and WebLogic and Oracle proper
ear deployments.
EclipseLink has two values that need to be set in persistence.xml depending
upon your Application Server and Database;
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:50 AM, John Patrick nhoj.patr...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm working on a project that uses JPA EclipseLink, everything started of
fine with Jetty for developers development and WebLogic and Oracle proper
ear deployments.
People still do that? Wow, thats educational in and
If those properties are specific to eclipselink, then I think it's ok and
simpler to just leave them in the persistence.xml even if they're actually
not used when EclipseLink isn't the provider. Then package only one ear.
Cheers
2013/7/9 John Patrick nhoj.patr...@gmail.com
I'm working on a
15 matches
Mail list logo
