Thanks for your responses, I'll try the solution of Tim even it's not
goot to not have version number in the jar file name ! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vendredi 12 décembre 2003 19:25
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Name of gener
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 11:30, Kyle Adams wrote:
> Granted, I also think it's a best practice to version JAR files; however, I'm not
> convinced that putting the version in the file name is a good idea, let alone a best
> practice.
>
> Filenames don't seem to be a good place for storing data like
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 10:51, Stéphane Philippart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in a case where I don't want version number on my deliverable files
> but i want to be able to use the install targets to install my app in
> the repository to refence the file with the dependency tag.
>
> When I don't put a
Granted, I also think it's a best practice to version JAR files; however, I'm not
convinced that putting the version in the file name is a good idea, let alone a best
practice.
Filenames don't seem to be a good place for storing data like this, especially when
you have Sun's versioning specs
jar plugin.
-Tim
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
All jars MUST have a version. It's a best practices.
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: "Stéphane Philippart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Users List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, Decem
All jars MUST have a version. It's a best practices.
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: "Stéphane Philippart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Users List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:51 PM
Subject: Name of generate
Hi,
I am in a case where I don't want version number on my deliverable files
but i want to be able to use the install targets to install my app in
the repository to refence the file with the dependency tag.
When I don't put a tag in my project.xml (or put the
tag ) the generated file are all w
