RE: [M2] can we use 'mvn assembly' instead assembly:assembly

2006-06-05 Thread Mike Perham
Maven Users List Subject: RE: [M2] can we use 'mvn assembly' instead assembly:assembly All the mvn2 documentation I've seen said you need to explicitly call package THEN assembly, bind it to something later like verify (and use that). http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugi

RE: [M2] can we use 'mvn assembly' instead assembly:assembly

2006-06-05 Thread EJ Ciramella
y, June 05, 2006 3:45 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: RE: [M2] can we use 'mvn assembly' instead assembly:assembly You would use 'mvn package' and bind the assembly:assembly mojo to the 'package' build lifecycle phase in your pom. I could swear I've seen an e

RE: [M2] can we use 'mvn assembly' instead assembly:assembly

2006-06-05 Thread EJ Ciramella
List Subject: RE: [M2] can we use 'mvn assembly' instead assembly:assembly Based on my limited understanding, no. One is requesting a plugin goal, the other is requesting execution of a build phase. In other words 'install' != 'install:install'. 'mvn instal

RE: [M2] can we use 'mvn assembly' instead assembly:assembly

2006-06-05 Thread Mike Perham
You would use 'mvn package' and bind the assembly:assembly mojo to the 'package' build lifecycle phase in your pom. I could swear I've seen an example on the list before but I don't have an convienent example. -Original Message- From: hamdard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June

RE: [M2] can we use 'mvn assembly' instead assembly:assembly

2006-06-05 Thread Beyer,Nathan
Based on my limited understanding, no. One is requesting a plugin goal, the other is requesting execution of a build phase. In other words 'install' != 'install:install'. 'mvn install' == execute the default build lifecycle up to and including the install phase, which should execute all plugin goa