This is a good doc. Thanks. I don't think its entirely accurate though. For instance Continuum does not have the feature yet to invoke builds based on SCM changes. It is strictly a time based configuration. This document indicates differently. Its also says that CruiseControl does not support M2. Not sure if that is accurate now/still. It's a helpful and ambitious document, but is it being maintaining for accuracy over time?
>> Continuum / M2 tighter integration My comment here is not based on fact, just an observation that the people behind these scenes of M2 and Continuum project a sense they are all pointing in the same, metaphorical direction. -----Original Message----- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Herscu Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 3:55 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Why Continuum? Jonathan, thanks for your fast reply. Finally, I have found a comparison here: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Se rver+Feature+Matrix But, still I do not understand what is the "tighter integration with Maven 2" all about. Using CC I still can invoke Maven (1 or 2 -- does it matter?) through the shell interface -- isn't it? Johnson, Jonathan wrote: > If you are looking for a richer feature set stick with CruiseControl. > > Continuum is still relatively new and many features you have > CruiseControl are not yet available in Continuum. > > I chose to try Continuum because of my simple build requirements which > will grow hopefully with the Continuum and Maven 2 feature sets. In > addition I opted for Continuums tighter integration with Maven 2. > > If the feature sets were the same I would recommend Continuum because of > it tighter integration with Maven 2. > > Many of the feature you might expect to find in Continuum are really in > Maven 2 (where they should be, well.. at least when they are written as > a plugin for Maven 2). Be careful of comparing the apples to oranges. > Be aware that Maven 2 and Continuum have only been around for a few > months and more features are anticipated this year. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Herscu > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 2:59 PM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Why Continuum? > > Hi all, > > I am trying to find the answer to this question with no success. > Currently, I am using CruiseControl -- why should I (or others like me) > switch to Continuum? > > Adrian. > > > LEGAL NOTICE: > Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. > > >
