Re: Difference between compile and provided scope for jar artifacts

2012-01-20 Thread Martin Schayna
If you want to include all dependencies into jar, you can use maven assembly plugin. You can integrate it to build process, see: http://stackoverflow.com/a/589111/121143 I have done this for creating full-blown jar with test which can be easily uploaded to Amazon micro instance for load testin

RE: Difference between compile and provided scope for jar artifacts

2012-01-20 Thread Ansgar Konermann
gar.konerm...@googlemail.com] > > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 9:57 AM > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: Difference between compile and provided scope for jar > > artifacts > > > > Am 20.01.2012 17:44 schrieb : > > > > > > When I build

RE: Difference between compile and provided scope for jar artifacts

2012-01-20 Thread Matt Walsh
ermann [mailto:ansgar.konerm...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 9:57 AM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Difference between compile and provided scope for jar > artifacts > > Am 20.01.2012 17:44 schrieb : > > > > When I build a jar file, the compile

Re: Difference between compile and provided scope for jar artifacts

2012-01-20 Thread Ansgar Konermann
Am 20.01.2012 17:44 schrieb : > > When I build a jar file, the compile dependencies are not packaged into the jar. So, this means that they are expected to be provided somewhere else in the run time environment, doesn't it? Which means that it doesn't seem like there's a difference between compil

RE: Difference between compile and provided scope for jar artifacts

2012-01-20 Thread Matt Walsh
Makes more sense in terms of a WAR. Compile scope jars are copied to WEB-INF/lib. Provided scope jars aren't. For example, the servlet-api would be "provided" by the servlet container. Matt > -Original Message- > From: chad.da...@emc.com [mailto:chad.da...@emc.com] > Sent: Friday, January