Re: jnlp plugin

2010-04-21 Thread sudharma karekar
No. Only the main class is in the jnlp-main-jar Dennis Lundberg-2 wrote: > > Does jnlp-war have a normal dependency on jnlp-main-jar? > > On 2010-04-21 08:47, sudharma karekar wrote: >> >> I have a parent project called jnlp-test under which I have two projects >> jnlp-war and jnlp-main-jar >

Re: jnlp plugin

2010-04-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Does jnlp-war have a normal dependency on jnlp-main-jar? On 2010-04-21 08:47, sudharma karekar wrote: > > I have a parent project called jnlp-test under which I have two projects > jnlp-war and jnlp-main-jar > It looks something like this > > jnlp-test(parent) > jnlp-main-jar(child) > jnlp-war(c

Re: JNLP Plugin: use JAR files that are signed by different certificates?

2005-01-05 Thread Gezerk
Cheers, > > Masa > > > > Masahiro Takatsuka, PhD > > Director: ViSLAB > > The University of Sydney > > Tel. +61 2 9351 5903, Fax. +61 2 9351 5955 > > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > From: Martin Skopp [mailto:

Re: JNLP Plugin

2004-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Actually, it isn't possible. You can open an issue and eventually provide a patch. Emmanuel - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:53 AM Subject: JNLP Plugin How can I prevent re-updating the manifest and re-signing th

RE: JNLP plugin

2004-10-25 Thread Colin Hawkett
OK I kind of got it working, but I needed to run jnlp against each project, which means that I get a jnlp file for every project in the deployment directory - has anyone managed to get the whole dependency structure working and copied? Also I have to manually sign third party jars (e.g. log4j) - s

Réf. : Re: jnlp plugin 1.4.1

2004-08-26 Thread julien . kirch
>Can you redownload it and recheck? >Thanks. >Emmanuel This one's better Good for me De nada Julien This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify t

Re: jnlp plugin 1.4.1

2004-08-26 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Can you redownload it and recheck? Thanks. Emmanuel - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 2:59 PM Subject: jnlp plugin 1.4.1 > Hi maveners, > > When I try the jnlp plugin 1.4.1 I got a > > Could not load class: org.apache

Re: jnlp plugin 1.4.1

2004-08-26 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Apparently, I had a problem with the release. I recreate it now. Emmanuel - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 2:59 PM Subject: jnlp plugin 1.4.1 > Hi maveners, > > When I try the jnlp plugin 1.4.1 I got a > > Could not

RE: JNLP Plugin: use JAR files that are signed by different certificates?

2004-08-25 Thread Martin Skopp
age- > > From: Martin Skopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 2:03 AM > > To: Maven Users List > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: JNLP Plugin: use JAR files that are signed > > bydifferentcertificates? > >

Re: JNLP Plugin: use JAR files that are signed by differentcertificates?

2004-08-18 Thread Martin Skopp
Thanks for the link, Emmanuel. Masa - do you have a fresh diff to contribute to me and/or JIRA? Thanks everybody, Martin On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 14:18, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > It's an open issue. If you want to reimplement it. > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJNLP-2 > > Emmanuel > >

Re: JNLP Plugin: use JAR files that are signed by differentcertificates?

2004-08-17 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
It's an open issue. If you want to reimplement it. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJNLP-2 Emmanuel - Original Message - From: "Martin Skopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:03 PM Subject: JNLP Plugin: use JAR files that are si

Re: JNLP Plugin not working in 1.0

2004-08-15 Thread Dion Gillard
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 13. August 2004 22:34 > > > > An: Maven Users List > > > > Betreff: Re: JNLP Plugin not working in 1.0 > > > > > > >

Re: JNLP Plugin not working in 1.0

2004-08-14 Thread Martin van den Bemt
üngliche Nachricht- > > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 13. August 2004 22:34 > > > An: Maven Users List > > > Betreff: Re: JNLP Plugin not working in 1.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: JNLP Plugin not working in 1.0

2004-08-13 Thread Dion Gillard
ll the patch (if it is one)? > > Thanks a lot > Daniel > > > -UrsprÃngliche Nachricht- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Freitag, 13. August 2004 22:34 > > An: Maven Users List > > Betreff: Re: JNLP Plug

Re: JNLP Plugin not working in 1.0

2004-08-13 Thread Martin van den Bemt
t; directory. Any hints for how to install the patch (if it is one)? > > Thanks a lot > Daniel > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Freitag, 13. August 2004 22:34 > > An: Maven Users List > &

Re: JNLP Plugin not working in 1.0

2004-08-13 Thread mwe
It is a bug in plugin.jelly. See: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJNLP-13 Marcin Werla Wiadomość Oryginalna Od: Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Do: 'Maven Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Data: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:00:00 +0200 Temat: JNLP Plugin not working in 1.0 --

Re: [jnlp-plugin] Property tag

2004-03-15 Thread Henri Yandell
Sweet. maven.jnlp.properties=com.foo.value com.foo.value=bar So the properties seems to work. Still hacking with the turning offness of signed jars. [email was initially sent after exhausting the online documentation, but now i've a bee in my bonnet and am looking at the jelly code]

Re: [jnlp-plugin] Property tag

2004-03-15 Thread Henri Yandell
I can see: ${maven.jnlp.properties} Though I don't know exactly what format that expects it in. I suspect looking into more would help. Whatever that is. On the signing jar issue. It seems to somehow think th