RE: No Cobertura, please

2008-11-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
Doesn't cobertura have a skip parameter? -Original Message- From: Blake Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 10:58 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: No Cobertura, please Is there a way to disable Cobertura? When it runs, my test lifecycle is run again, and I do

Re: No Cobertura, please

2008-11-03 Thread Trevor Harmon
On Nov 3, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: Strange, but true analogy - quantum cryptography is so interesting because of the same principle: "we cannot observe a phenomena without changing it" Otherwise known as the Heisenbug: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unusual_software_bug Trevor

Re: No Cobertura, please

2008-11-03 Thread Oleg Gusakov
I concur 100%! Strange, but true analogy - quantum cryptography is so interesting because of the same principle: "we cannot observe a phenomena without changing it" Stephen Connolly wrote: Unless you are trying to do: "Stupid code coverage mistake #1"... "Stupid code coverage mistake #1" is

Re: No Cobertura, please

2008-11-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
Unless you are trying to do: "Stupid code coverage mistake #1"... "Stupid code coverage mistake #1" is only running your tests once (usually with instrumentation... but the same mistake works the other way around). This is a mistake because 99.9% of developers (who try to do this) do not understan

Re: No Cobertura, please

2008-11-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
put the cobertura plugin configuration in a profile that is not active by default. 2008/11/3 Blake Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Is there a way to disable Cobertura? When it runs, my test lifecycle is run > again, and I don't want this to happen. I want the POM to behave like > Cobertura doesn't e