,
mohan kr
-Original Message-
From: lvdpal [mailto:lvd...@lunaris-informatica.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:25 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: RE: Putting instrumented classes on the classpath
Thanks, this at least gives me a hint where to start looking.
mkr wrote:
>
Thanks, this at least gives me a hint where to start looking.
mkr wrote:
>
> You have to give more information? I have looked at the thread..but if
> you
> were using
> the cobertura-maven-plugin and just have the "intstrument" goal, it *WILL*
> put the
> instrumented classes in the classpath
the modded plugin
Thanks,
mohan kr
-Original Message-
From: lvdpal [mailto:lvd...@lunaris-informatica.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:23 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: RE: Putting instrumented classes on the classpath
Because I'm still looking for a solution to th
Because I'm still looking for a solution to this prolem. It's such a shame to
use Sonar when having tests and not getting any code coverage.
lvdpal wrote:
>
> Nobody else has any ideas?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Putting-instrumented-classes-on-the-classpath-tp
Nobody else has any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Putting-instrumented-classes-on-the-classpath-tp24183679p24425518.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsu
Hi Mohan,
I'm not quite sure what you're saying, but yeah, as far as I know the
instrumented files have to be on the classpath for EasyB to pick them up.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Putting-instrumented-classes-on-the-classpath-tp24183679p24184602.html
Sent from the M
Maybe you can put have *two* executions of the antrun plugin?
But, going to the original issue, it appears that the instrumented cobertura
classes
*should* be in the classpath of the maven reactor? Because I look at the
source
for the instrumented goal..this is what it shows
// Set t
