From: ext Jason van Zyl [ja...@sonatype.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 8:10 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Questions on SNAPSHOTs
On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:00 PM, wrote:
> Thank you Vincent. This is what I thought, but just wanted to confirm. IMHO,
> having your l
incent Latombe [vincent.lato...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 6:59 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Questions on SNAPSHOTs
>
> Hello Brian
>
> What you assume is right : if the timestamp of a remote artifact is more
> recent than the timestamp o
October 16, 2010 6:59 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Questions on SNAPSHOTs
Hello Brian
What you assume is right : if the timestamp of a remote artifact is more
recent than the timestamp of a local artifact (under .m2), it will download
the version from the remote repository. This will be happ
Hello Brian
What you assume is right : if the timestamp of a remote artifact is more
recent than the timestamp of a local artifact (under .m2), it will download
the version from the remote repository. This will be happening depending on
the updatePolicy (daily by default), or if you add -U flag to
: Saturday, October 16, 2010 5:01 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Questions on SNAPSHOTs
On Oct 16, 2010, at 4:42 PM, wrote:
> That's what I get for trying to save a step by replying to someone else's
> post, but forgetting to change the subject :-[
That's called "thr
On Oct 16, 2010, at 4:42 PM, wrote:
> That's what I get for trying to save a step by replying to someone else's
> post, but forgetting to change the subject :-[
That's called "thread hijacking", and the problem with it is that the mail you
create will show up in everyone's inbox and every lis
