Re: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-15 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/15/05, Poppe, Troy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Heck, I'm interested even if Jerome isnt! Let's have it... > > > -Original Message- > From: Ryan Sonnek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:20 AM > To: Maven Users L

RE: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-15 Thread Poppe, Troy
Heck, I'm interested even if Jerome isnt! Let's have it... -Original Message- From: Ryan Sonnek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:20 AM To: Maven Users List; jerome lacoste Subject: RE: Why I hate Maven :-) not sure why geronimo isn't represe

RE: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-15 Thread Ryan Sonnek
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:16 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Why I hate Maven :-) On 6/15/05, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > take a look at geronimo for a LARGE project using maven. I haven't looked at geronimo's code, but sometimes large may not mean

Re: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-15 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/15/05, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > take a look at geronimo for a LARGE project using maven. I haven't looked at geronimo's code, but sometimes large may not mean representative. For example I have a client who has a typical J2EE webapp + some webstart thick clients. One of thes

RE: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-15 Thread Ryan Sonnek
take a look at geronimo for a LARGE project using maven. -Original Message- From: Anil Arora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 7:03 PM To: Maven Users List; Brett Porter Subject: RE: Why I hate Maven :-) Your counter point of having multiple artifacts per project is

RE: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-14 Thread Anil Arora
ation like Tomcat can be built using maven. Anil -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 1:18 AM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Why I hate Maven :-) On 6/14/05, Jim Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Porter recently

Re: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-14 Thread Jim Mochel
it as relatively recent. Jim Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/14/2005 04:17 AM Please respond to "Maven Users List" To Maven Users List cc Subject Re: Why I hate Maven :-) On 6/14/05, Jim Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Porter recently poste

Re: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-14 Thread Brett Porter
On 6/14/05, Jim Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Porter recently posted a BLOG entry asking why some people hate > Maven. Hmmm.. unless I'm mistaken that was last year! Maybe the blog software decided to send out a refresh :) Regardless, you make some good points here - thanks for taking

RE: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-13 Thread Jim Mochel
. LOL. Jim "Stevenson, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/13/2005 11:28 AM Please respond to "Maven Users List" To "'Maven Users List'" cc Subject RE: Why I hate Maven :-) Jim, On your point about SOA and Maven. We have the same problem at

RE: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-13 Thread Justin_Freitag
'Maven Users List' 14/06/2005 01:28 cc AM Subject

Re: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-13 Thread Wim Deblauwe
> ISSUE: The one project, one artifact rule is a great rule for > configuration management > BUT it puts the onus of managing complexity on the developer rather than > the tool. > The ability for a project to be able to register that it produces N > artifacts and list those artifacts, ids,

RE: Why I hate Maven :-)

2005-06-13 Thread Stevenson, Chris
Jim, On your point about SOA and Maven. We have the same problem at my company. But you have to remember that the unit tests are to test the unit of deployment and its code. It sounds like what you're doing is integration testing (proxy code -> server code) which is a different kettle of fish. We