On 6/15/05, Poppe, Troy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heck, I'm interested even if Jerome isnt! Let's have it...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Sonnek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:20 AM
> To: Maven Users L
Heck, I'm interested even if Jerome isnt! Let's have it...
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Sonnek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:20 AM
To: Maven Users List; jerome lacoste
Subject: RE: Why I hate Maven :-)
not sure why geronimo isn't represe
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:16 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Why I hate Maven :-)
On 6/15/05, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> take a look at geronimo for a LARGE project using maven.
I haven't looked at geronimo's code, but sometimes large may not mean
On 6/15/05, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> take a look at geronimo for a LARGE project using maven.
I haven't looked at geronimo's code, but sometimes large may not mean
representative.
For example I have a client who has a typical J2EE webapp + some
webstart thick clients.
One of thes
take a look at geronimo for a LARGE project using maven.
-Original Message-
From: Anil Arora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 7:03 PM
To: Maven Users List; Brett Porter
Subject: RE: Why I hate Maven :-)
Your counter point of having multiple artifacts per project is
ation
like Tomcat can be built using maven.
Anil
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 1:18 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Why I hate Maven :-)
On 6/14/05, Jim Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Porter recently
it as relatively
recent.
Jim
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/14/2005 04:17 AM
Please respond to
"Maven Users List"
To
Maven Users List
cc
Subject
Re: Why I hate Maven :-)
On 6/14/05, Jim Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Porter recently poste
On 6/14/05, Jim Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Porter recently posted a BLOG entry asking why some people hate
> Maven.
Hmmm.. unless I'm mistaken that was last year! Maybe the blog software
decided to send out a refresh :)
Regardless, you make some good points here - thanks for taking
.
LOL.
Jim
"Stevenson, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/13/2005 11:28 AM
Please respond to
"Maven Users List"
To
"'Maven Users List'"
cc
Subject
RE: Why I hate Maven :-)
Jim,
On your point about SOA and Maven. We have the same problem at
'Maven Users List'
14/06/2005 01:28 cc
AM
Subject
> ISSUE: The one project, one artifact rule is a great rule for
> configuration management
> BUT it puts the onus of managing complexity on the developer rather than
> the tool.
> The ability for a project to be able to register that it produces N
> artifacts and list those artifacts, ids,
Jim,
On your point about SOA and Maven. We have the same problem at my company.
But you have to remember that the unit tests are to test the unit of
deployment and its code. It sounds like what you're doing is integration
testing (proxy code -> server code) which is a different kettle of fish.
We
12 matches
Mail list logo