Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-09-02 Thread Brian Fox
I can say definitively that transitive was not intended for Copy/Unpack. I wrote these goals with a very specific use case and that was to be able to cherry-pick artifacts from this list. The xxx-dependencies goals where intended to support transitivity. On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:49 AM, EJ Ciramel

RE: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-09-01 Thread EJ Ciramella
Actually, it very specifically says nothing about dependencies under the copy goal. It merely says "artifacts." There is a difference... This is why maven is so polarizing - either you love it or hate it. "specifically saying nothing" - it should be explicit... Thanks again all for the clarif

Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-08-31 Thread Wayne Fay
> That doesn't even say "just these dependencies, not even their > dependencies" > > /shrug Actually, it very specifically says nothing about dependencies under the copy goal. It merely says "artifacts." There is a difference... Wayne

RE: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-08-31 Thread EJ Ciramella
12 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question "dependency:copy<http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/copy-mojo.html>takes a list of artifacts defined in the plugin configuration section and copies them to a specified location&quo

Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-08-31 Thread Anders Hammar
t in the > documentation? > > -Original Message- > From: anders.g.ham...@gmail.com [mailto:anders.g.ham...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Anders Hammar > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:34 PM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) quest

Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-08-31 Thread Brian Fox
Yes it was intentional. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:33 PM, EJ Ciramella wrote: > I've noticed recently that "copy-dependencies" finds the transitive > dependencies, but "copy" does not. > > Is this intentional? > > We'd like to NOT have to repeat a majority of the dependencies when just > using "

RE: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-08-31 Thread EJ Ciramella
the copy-dependencies goal. > > Is this expected behavior? > > -Original Message- > From: anders.g.ham...@gmail.com [mailto:anders.g.ham...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Anders Hammar > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:26 PM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: maven-dependen

Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-08-31 Thread Anders Hammar
--Original Message- > From: anders.g.ham...@gmail.com [mailto:anders.g.ham...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Anders Hammar > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:26 PM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question > > You can exclude the trans

RE: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-08-31 Thread EJ Ciramella
Original Message- From: anders.g.ham...@gmail.com [mailto:anders.g.ham...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Anders Hammar Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:26 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question You can exclude the transitive deps: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/ma

Re: maven-dependency-plugin (version 2.1) question

2010-08-31 Thread Anders Hammar
You can exclude the transitive deps: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/copy-dependencies-mojo.html#excludeTransitive /Anders On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 19:33, EJ Ciramella wrote: > I've noticed recently that "copy-dependencies" finds the transitive > dependencies, but "copy" d