: vincent.hard...@synchrotron-soleil.fr
-Message d'origine-
De : Wayne Fay [mailto:wayne...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 11 janvier 2010 22:39
À : Maven Users List
Objet : Re: No more com.oracle.ojdbc14-10.2.0.2.0.jar ?
I agree with pushing poms. I'm less inclined to agree with the
checksums
Gif sur Yvette
Tel : +33 1 69 35 93 39
mail : vincent.hard...@synchrotron-soleil.fr
-Message d'origine-
De : HARDION Vincent [mailto:vincent.hard...@synchrotron-soleil.fr]
Envoyé : mardi 12 janvier 2010 14:33
À : Maven Users List
Objet : RE : No more com.oracle.ojdbc14-10.2.0.2.0.jar
From my knowledge, this is not an Open Source artifact so it may not be
available on central or codehaus.
Where did you get it from ?
Jeff MAURY
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:07 PM, HARDION Vincent
vincent.hard...@synchrotron-soleil.fr wrote:
Hi everybody,
Since this morning, the artifact
Since this morning, the artifact com.oracle.ojdbc14-10.2.0.2.0.jar was
not found anymore!!!
But the pom and the fingerprints was
I don't believe the ojdbc jar files have ever been hosted on Central
due to Oracle's licensing of those files which limits redistribution.
What makes you think the
Wayne,
have a look at
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/oracle/ojdbc14/10.2.0.2.0/
What The F**k are the .md5 files for the jar doing there and no .jar?
-Stephen
2010/1/11 Wayne Fay wayne...@gmail.com:
Since this morning, the artifact com.oracle.ojdbc14-10.2.0.2.0.jar was
not found
What The F**k are the .md5 files for the jar doing there and no .jar?
Yea, I noticed that too, and definitely find it odd. Perhaps someone
pushed the files there accidentally at some point?
We probably need Carlos or another repo maintainer to make a comment.
It is possible the Jar was there
I did it some time ago as this was condidered a good practice : define a
common POM and checksums for artifacts that are not freely redistribuable,
but that user may include in a custom repo.
There is some other entries en central like this one (metadatas without jar)
2010/1/11 Wayne Fay
i may have added the checksums. It allows to check that the jar
matches what was supposed to be in the repo but can't be for legal
reasons.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:09 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I did it some time ago as this was condidered a good practice : define a
I agree with pushing poms. I'm less inclined to agree with the
checksums... but that's OK, I don't really care either way.
Now back to Vincent... what makes you think this jar file EVER existed
in Central??
Wayne
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
