Hi Brett!
> I think an independent plugin hosted on maven-plugins.sf.net is the
> best approach here.
>
> - Brett
Cool! That should be my next step. I take a look at it.
> > Just tried the extension on Jira. I got 49 errors, whereas Doc Check
> > reported 163. The extension picks up only ma
I think an independent plugin hosted on maven-plugins.sf.net is the
best approach here.
- Brett
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:03:05 +0900, Shinobu Kawai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Just tried the extension on Jira. I got 49 errors, whereas Doc Check
> reported 163. The extension picks up
Hi!
Just tried the extension on Jira. I got 49 errors, whereas Doc Check
reported 163. The extension picks up only malformed tags, but Doc Check
picks up missing tags also.
I'll go ahead and put Doc Check into the plugin, and I guess I should
talk to the Sun people about it... Or if it is easy
Hi Arnaud!
Thanks for the information. It looks like I have to change the
javadoc plugin anyways, but I'll give it a try.
Best regards,
-- Shinobu Kawai
> A similar enhancement is proposed in this issue :
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVADOC-35
>
> An example was given here (but now th
A similar enhancement is proposed in this issue :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVADOC-35
An example was given here (but now they corrected their javadoc problems) :
http://sqlcli.sourceforge.net/javadoc-audit-report.html
Even if were interested to integrate it, I'm not sure that we can uplo
