Oh, I should add that I thought better about rsync. Instead I made my site
deploy location be a file:/// pointing to my checked out site docs.
I don't think that has the nice effect that the SSH wagon does of wiping the
previous contents, but there are ways... That's why Larry invented Perl.
-K
That would be up to you, but you're not the hosting site. You're just a
way-station on the way from Google Code to Central.
My solution works, by the way. I deployed another release, having turned off
timestamps in the javadocs. I then committed that and all is well. See
http://seaglass.googlec
Maybe we should just turn on site hosting @ oss.sonatype.org in Nexus
2010/3/25 Kathryn Huxtable :
> Okay, here's a somewhat manual solution:
>
> Before doing anything else, create a "site" branch in your subversion
> repository and check it out into a directory outside your project's
> dire
Okay, here's a somewhat manual solution:
Before doing anything else, create a "site" branch in your subversion
repository and check it out into a directory outside your project's directory,
say "myproject-site".
Set the auto-props in your subversion config file to set *.html, *.css, *.png,
*.g
Yes, there's that, but I was willing to write something that set those after
the fact. -K
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:56 PM, lukewpatterson wrote:
>
>
> justinedelson wrote:
>>
>> Did you look at wagon-svn?
>>
>
> wagon-svn would be great but it doesn't support mime-type auto-props, which
> is cr
justinedelson wrote:
>
> Did you look at wagon-svn?
>
wagon-svn would be great but it doesn't support mime-type auto-props, which
is crucial for site deployment
https://wagon-svn.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Deploying-site-to-s
Thanks! I'll stick with my personal site for now. -K
On Mar 24, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Justin Edelson wrote:
> My experience was that wagon-svn was faster than dav, but they both
> are sub-par compared with scp because there's no way to remotely
> execute a command (I.e. unzip).
>
> Justin
>
> On Ma
My experience was that wagon-svn was faster than dav, but they both
are sub-par compared with scp because there's no way to remotely
execute a command (I.e. unzip).
Justin
On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
> Yes, I did. It works fine for deploying artifacts, as there are
> u
Yes, I did. It works fine for deploying artifacts, as there are usually only a
few.
When deploying a site, though, it doesn't scale well. It deploys each file
separately, or at least the last version I tried did.
It took hours. I don't consider that reasonable when the wagon-ssh deploys in
les
Did you look at wagon-svn?
On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
> My project is hosted at Google Code, and I'm syncing to Central via
> Sonatype.
>
> I've been deploying my site documentation to my personal website
> because I have ssh access there and the ssh wagon is very effi
10 matches
Mail list logo
