Re: changing location of site.xml

2008-04-15 Thread Dmitry Beransky
D'oh! I should have realized the version issue. Thanks, putting the version in did the trick. On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Wayne Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should specify a version of the site plugin to make sure you're using the version you think you are. But I agree with Jason

Re: changing location of site.xml

2008-04-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
Why would you want to? You just make it harder for anyone new to a project to understand where all the resources for a project are. You can override it, but what real value is there in it? On 14-Apr-08, at 9:14 AM, Dmitry Beransky wrote: Hi, Does anyone know what the deal is with this

Re: changing location of site.xml

2008-04-14 Thread Dmitry Beransky
we don't follow maven's suggested project layout. On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why would you want to? You just make it harder for anyone new to a project to understand where all the resources for a project are. You can override it, but what real

Re: changing location of site.xml

2008-04-14 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Dmitry Beransky wrote: Hi, Does anyone know what the deal is with this bug: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-91? It's marked as resolved, but in version 2.0.7 I still cannot change the location of site.xml from the default of src/site. This is handled by the site plugin. Plugins have a

Re: changing location of site.xml

2008-04-14 Thread Wayne Fay
You should specify a version of the site plugin to make sure you're using the version you think you are. But I agree with Jason and think this is generally a bad idea. Wayne On 4/14/08, Dmitry Beransky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we don't follow maven's suggested project layout. On Mon, Apr 14,