Re: activation by property versus versus releases versus integration tests

2010-08-25 Thread Benson Margulies
I don't know how interested they are in messing with their 'version 6' branch, though some of us are glued to it at the moment. I can but ask. I keep wishing that Maven itself had more ways that profile (b) could turn off things from the base or a previous profile (a). On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:5

Re: activation by property versus versus releases versus integration tests

2010-08-24 Thread Wayne Fay
> problem. However, the maven-jetty-plugin lacks a 'skip' property. I > > Anyone got another suggestion? Add/request the skip property for m-jetty-p? Should be super simple to do. Wayne - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr..

activation by property versus versus releases versus integration tests

2010-08-24 Thread Benson Margulies
I am a bit stumped to discover that skip.integration.tests false is not triggered by a property setting inside the POM itself. Only a command-line -D will do. My problem is that I'm trying to turn off some i