RE: default checksumPolicy is warn. Can we switch to fail ?

2008-05-01 Thread chago
. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/default-checksumPolicy-is-warn.-Can-we-switch-to-fail---tp16368696s177p16995001.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e

Re: default checksumPolicy is warn. Can we switch to fail ?

2008-04-30 Thread chago
? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/default-checksumPolicy-is-warn.-Can-we-switch-to-fail---tp16368696s177p16991720.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e

Re: default checksumPolicy is warn. Can we switch to fail ?

2008-04-30 Thread Wayne Fay
]. This was in 2005. Are these problems still valid ? Could maven switch to a fail default policy ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/default-checksumPolicy-is-warn.-Can-we-switch-to-fail---tp16368696s177p16991720.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive

RE: default checksumPolicy is warn. Can we switch to fail ?

2008-04-30 Thread Brian E. Fox
, April 30, 2008 5:18 PM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: default checksumPolicy is warn. Can we switch to fail ? I'm not sure if fail is the right move, nor do I think warn is correct. That is unless some other behavior is put in place. Namely, a checksum failure in a repository should simply

default checksumPolicy is warn. Can we switch to fail ?

2008-03-29 Thread Jerome Lacoste
Hei, I think there's a problem somewhere in the artifact downloading process. And I also wonder why the default checksumPolicy is warn. Because of a flaky internet line, my local repository got badly corrupted and basic things didn't work at all in very strange ways. The cause: jars were