Hi all,
the vote has passed with the following result:
PMC +1: Anders Hammar, Arnaud Héritier, Benjamin Marwell, Guillaume
Nodet, Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Konrad Windszus, ,Maarten
Mulders, Olivier Lamy, Romain Manni-Bucau, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Tamás
Cservenák
PMC majority quorum:
+1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:31 AM Benjamin Marwell
wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17
+1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, 08:31 Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for
+1 (non-binding; for JDK 17 or 21)
leaving JDK 8 behind is an important step for the java community.
-mbien
On 28.02.24 08:30, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
start a vote in favour of
+1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 6:31 PM Benjamin Marwell
wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17
+1 (nonbinding)
On 2/28/24 08:30, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for Maven
+1 (Non binding)
Enrico
Il Gio 29 Feb 2024, 09:01 Tim te Beek ha scritto:
> +1 from occasional contributor
>
> Would unblock phasing out more utils methods & dependencies.
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 8:53 AM Thomas Matthijs wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, at 08:30, Benjamin
+1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, at 08:30, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17
+1
Note that putting it at java 21 would also get a +1 from me.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, 08:31 Benjamin Marwell, wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java
+1. It’s time to move on.
Arnaud Héritier
Twitter/GitHub/... : aheritier
Le mer. 28 févr. 2024 à 08:31, Benjamin Marwell a
écrit :
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the
+1
Greetings
Matthias
Am 28.02.2024 um 08:30 schrieb Benjamin Marwell:
Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require
Hi Joseph,
+. 8
Xalan-J's next release should be Maven-based. But we wanted to put out one Java
8-compatible-but-deprecated build before moving to Java 17.
I guess you're mixing a few things here:
Maven 3 (or 4, doesn't matter) needing Java >= version X only means that
you need that version
_
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:44:49 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Cc: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4
>
> +1
>
> Also good idea to remind folks to stay focused in a vote thread.
>
with overcompensated writer's block. May be
redundant, verbose, prolix, sesquipedalian, didactic, officious, or redundant.
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:44:49 AM
To: Maven Users List
Cc: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17
+1
Also good idea to remind folks to stay focused in a vote thread.
Gary
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, 2:31 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal
+1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:31 AM Benjamin Marwell
wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17
+1 On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:53:29 -0500 dathew...@gmail.com wrote +1
Le mer. 28 févr. 2024 à 09:54, Lasse Lindqvist
a écrit :
> +1
>
> ke 28. helmik. 2024 klo 10.30 Jean-Baptiste Onofré (j...@nanthrax.net)
> kirjoitti:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > It makes sense to me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
+1
Le mer. 28 févr. 2024 à 09:54, Lasse Lindqvist
a écrit :
> +1
>
> ke 28. helmik. 2024 klo 10.30 Jean-Baptiste Onofré (j...@nanthrax.net)
> kirjoitti:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > It makes sense to me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:42 AM Anders Hammar wrote:
> >
+1
On Feb 28, 2024 at 2:31 AM -0500, Benjamin Marwell , wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java
+1
Konrad
> On 28. Feb 2024, at 08:30, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
>
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require
+1
śr., 28 lut 2024 o 08:31 Benjamin Marwell napisał(a):
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17
+1 (non binding)
Java 17 is sufficient for resolving the compilation error that initially
brought this discussion (HTML heading out of sequence). For that
specific problem, Java 17 or 21 are both fine (but Java 11 was not).
Martin
Hi,
+1 from me.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 28.02.24 08:30, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
of Maven-Core 4 to 17
+1
ke 28. helmik. 2024 klo 10.30 Jean-Baptiste Onofré (j...@nanthrax.net)
kirjoitti:
>
> +1
>
> It makes sense to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:42 AM Anders Hammar wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > /Anders
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:30 AM Benjamin Marwell
> >
+1
It makes sense to me.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:42 AM Anders Hammar wrote:
>
> +1
>
> /Anders
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:30 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
> >
> > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I
+1
(although I'd prefer to directly require Java 21 :-))
Regards
Thorsten
Am 28.02.24 um 08:30 schrieb Benjamin Marwell:
Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java
+1
J
On 28/02/2024 08:30, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for Maven 4.
+1
I would just like to get help on enablers
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 28 février 2024, 08:30:07 CET Benjamin Marwell a écrit :
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the
+1
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024, 09:31 Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for
+1
/Anders
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:30 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote:
>
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence
+1 (nonbinding)
On 2/27/2024 11:30 PM, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for
+1 (non binding)
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:31 AM Benjamin Marwell
wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
> start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
> of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence
Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to
start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target
of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for Maven 4.
This is a procedural majority vote [1*]:
You can also
33 matches
Mail list logo
