Le 4/1/14 10:34 AM, TRAN Antoine a écrit :
> Thank you for your quick answer.
>
> On 31/03/2014 21:59, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Le 3/31/14 9:56 PM, Jon V. a écrit :
>> TCP works perfectly. If there is a problem. It is elsewhere.
>>
>> Implementing message delivery confirmation is a part of a hi
Thank you for your quick answer.
On 31/03/2014 21:59, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 3/31/14 9:56 PM, Jon V. a écrit :
> TCP works perfectly. If there is a problem. It is elsewhere.
>
> Implementing message delivery confirmation is a part of a higher level
> protocol. If the network/TCP is connected
Le 3/31/14 9:56 PM, Jon V. a écrit :
> TCP works perfectly. If there is a problem. It is elsewhere.
>
> Implementing message delivery confirmation is a part of a higher level
> protocol. If the network/TCP is connected; it will be delivered.
>
> In what environment are you expecting TCP sockets to
TCP works perfectly. If there is a problem. It is elsewhere.
Implementing message delivery confirmation is a part of a higher level
protocol. If the network/TCP is connected; it will be delivered.
In what environment are you expecting TCP sockets to close all the time?
Here is what happening reg
Hi,
Goal
I would like to improve the reliability of our program using Mina.
>From the research and tests I have made, it seems:
1. TCP reliability is not enough for messages not to be lost.
2. Mina does not offer message sent acknowledgment.
3. Lost of connection can be detected with the IO
