Le 18/08/2017 à 15:54, Jonathan Valliere a écrit :
> I don't have the code in front of me, but are you saying that the
> modification of the Write Queue is no longer concurrent? Possibly the
> Write Queue is a concurrent data structure and the synchronize mechanism is
> no longer required. It s
I don't have the code in front of me, but are you saying that the
modification of the Write Queue is no longer concurrent? Possibly the
Write Queue is a concurrent data structure and the synchronize mechanism is
no longer required. It seems odd that someone would remove concurrency
from that crit
Replying on dev@mina.a.o. Thanks to avoid cross posting in the future :-)
Le 18/08/2017 à 05:41, 胡阳 a écrit :
> Hi guys:
> I read the source code of MINA3.0M2. The style of the code is very
> good, the structure is clear, the design is concise and efficient, especially
> the use of Sel
Hi guys:
I read the source code of MINA3.0M2. The style of the code is very
good, the structure is clear, the design is concise and efficient, especially
the use of Selector is unexpected. However, the enqueueWriteRequest method and
the processWrite method in the AbstractNioSession are