Hi all,
I am using trinidad table in seam and facelets environment. One
strange behavior i absorbed is, when ever i send a ppr request to table, new
instance of CoreTable is created, this happens only if i use seam. is this
the expected behavior with seam or Is it a bug?? Is there any
IMHO the best way to deal with this is to use either JBoss Seam or
Apache Orchestra and put the bean in conversation or page scope
(though there aren't always natural boundaries to such a conversation,
so that may turn out to be not that easy, too).
david delbecq wrote:
simon a écrit :
Yes, it
simon a écrit :
Yes, it's a common issue.
In JSF 1.2 it is possible to detect whether a postback is in progress.
In your case, if you know that there are no editable fields then you
could then just return null, or an empty list. Of course you then need
to go back to really fetching data in the
OK, back to my real problem...
I can't seem to use PPR in cases where I modify the component tree at
runtime. I want to use a simple dialog. Eventually, the components which
launch and handle data 'returned' from the dialog will need to be
created via java code. My first attempt resulted in t
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 12:20 -0800, h b wrote:
> Hello, I'm new to jsf.
>
> Background:
> I have a page that shows a table of items using the datatable
> component. The datatable is bound to my backing beans items field.
> .
>
> myBean has a request scope.
>
> myBean.getItems() is implemented
That code creates a new PDF file from two existing byte arrays(?) on the
file system. The same code should work identically under JSF, the only
thing needing to be changed being context.getRealPath() -- is that the
bit you're asking for help with?
You should be able to replace that with someth
Hello, I'm new to jsf.
Background:
I have a page that shows a table of items using the datatable component.
The datatable is bound to my backing beans items field. .
myBean has a request scope.
myBean.getItems() is implemented as follows:
if (items == null) items = createItems();
return items;
hello bill,
please have a look at [1] and [2].
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/FAQ.html
[2] http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CompatibilityMatrix
2008/3/5, Zigc Junk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I am wondering if tranidad works with other jsf implementation (such as
> RI) oth
I am wondering if tranidad works with other jsf implementation (such as RI)
other than myfaces?
thanks
Bill
Meanwhile I've upgraded my Tomahawk libs to 1.1.5
Everything works fine now... :-))
Keep in mind to configure the Tomahawk extensions as in : HYPERLINK
"http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/extensionsFilter.html"http://myfaces.apa
che.org/tomahawk/extensionsFilter.html
-Original Message-
Henry Eduardo Iguaro wrote:
I also had this problem before,
Ugh... IDE's can make things too easy. Apparently I hadn't done a real
'clean' since downloading the latest trinidad jars. I had both the 1.0.5
and 1.0.6 jars under my target dir. Given how easy it is to invoke an
ant task from with
hello reto,
did you already consider to use the observer pattern?
(i already implemented this pattern for managed-beans.)
maybe such an approach is too complex for your scenario.
(i don't know your concrete goal.)
regards,
gerhard
2008/3/5, Reto Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Gerhard
>
> T
Use a ByteArrayOutputStream to write the result to a byte array, and then use
the following method in your backing bean to send it to the browser, and that's
it:
(Adapted from the MyFaces Wiki http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Sending_Files )
public void sentFileToBrowser(FacesContext aCont
Sorry but this user group was made to ask, so I ASK, in fact many users
maybe don´t saw the email yesterday and when I ask again if anybody knows?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] answer me, so I think YOU should stop sending mails
with not answers and saying that do a google search jajajaja if you don´t
know th
Hi,
I run into a problem with running myfaces on weblogic 10.0. This problem is
the same as MYFACES-1310. That case is marked as resolved but it still
happens on myfaces 1.2.2. Is there any myfaces developer here who can take a
look at it?
thanks
Bill
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, daniel ccss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody??
sending emails every 10 hours doesn't encourage folks to answer.
The topic PDF and JSF was already discussed here (and in other forums).
Doing a google search (or on the myfaces archives) mostly helps.
-M
Thanks for the answer, but I think this is not what I need.
What i need is a way to join 2 or more reports in one pdf file, like is done
in struts, with JSF:
*PdfReader reader1 = new PdfReader(bytes);
PdfReader reader2 = new PdfReader(bytes2);
PdfCopyFields copy = new PdfCopyFields(new FileOutpu
I also had this problem before, but after playing around with the
configuration files the 'issue' stop showing... to tell you the truth i
don't know what i did, but check my configuration files, maybe there is
something you're missing
---
Hi
If you want to send a text as a download file to the browser, so something like
this. You can also
Send a binary file the same way by modifying this method a little bit :
public void sentFileToBrowser(FacesContext aContext, String aFileName,
String aContent, boolean aAttachment) {
Well, if you're going to be a purist, the proper thing would be to
create a drop-in component subclass of checkbox that only accepted
checked=true input. :-)
But that's overkill. The most simple reusable way to do this is to
create a validator. I have a project, which when eventually
converted
Anybody??
Hi cristi,
Thanks for your reply. I need to implement this feature, i am ready to write
a renderer can you help me please.
thanks ravi
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Cristi Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is currently not supported by Trinidad skinning.
> But it would imply some client
Hi
Unfortunatly we cannot upgrade to 1.2 at the moment. I took a deeper look at
the code and found a bug in the facelets AliasBeanTagHandler. I posted an
issue to the tomahawk-facelets project with a patched version of the taghandler.
Regards
Mirko
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin
Leonardo has been organising this in last week or so, and a list of
sandbox components have been chosen for promotion. See the dev list
archives for details.
I'm not sure the captcha component should be immediately promoted from
sandbox to tomahawk though. At least it needs some real-world testing
I really do think that we should do a major graduation for sandbox
components. It is very likely that most of us always include the sandbox as
a production dependency. We should create a list of candidates (maybe we
could do a poll?) and graduate those components.
What do you think?
Bruno
On 04/
Thanks for you input.
I gave this some more thought on my way home last night. When I think
about it - is a validator the right place to do this kind of "business
logic" (e.g. user has checked the box)? Shouldn't validators be all about
semantics like correct value range or format?
For a thing li
Hi Gerhard
Thank you for your answer. In my application the user triggers a function
(by pressing a button) that affects all instances of a special type of Mbean
within his session. For this I have to call a method on those Mbeans.
It isn't a high performance solution but i think I can go with
27 matches
Mail list logo
