[Trinidad] Is it possible to unselect row in nested tr:table with Trinidad 1.2.10 ? Is there a way to get around tr:table using fly-weight pattern for CoreTable passed in SelectionEvent to selectionLi

2010-03-04 Thread IKiris
Hello folks, I have a nested (via using detailStamp faced) tr:table that is 2 levels deep (outer and inner). The rows of inner table is single row selectable (via rowSelection=single), while outer table is not selectable. Let's say I have 2 rows in outer table. Hence, I have 2 inner tables in

Re: [Trinidad] Is it possible to unselect row in nested tr:table with Trinidad 1.2.10 ? Is there a way to get around tr:table using fly-weight pattern for CoreTable passed in SelectionEvent to selec

2010-03-04 Thread Walter Mourão
Hi Ilker, Add a selectionListener to the inner table. When the selectionListener is fired, clear the outer table selection. Regards, Walter Mourão http://waltermourao.com.br http://arcadian.com.br http://oriens.com.br On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:04 AM, iki...@pershing.com wrote: Hello folks,

Re: [Trinidad] Is it possible to unselect row in nested tr:table with Trinidad 1.2.10 ? Is there a way to get around tr:table using fly-weight pattern for CoreTable passed in SelectionEvent to selec

2010-03-04 Thread IKiris
Hello Walter, Thank you for your reply. But as I was mentioning, the outer table is not selectable (meaning its rowSelection=none, which is default). Only the inner table is selectable. Hence, when 2nd inner table is selected, I want to be able to clear the selection of the 1st inner table.

Re: [Trinidad] Is it possible to unselect row in nested tr:table with Trinidad 1.2.10 ? Is there a way to get around tr:table using fly-weight pattern for CoreTable passed in SelectionEvent to selec

2010-03-04 Thread Walter Mourão
Thank you for your reply. But as I was mentioning, the outer table is not selectable (meaning its rowSelection=none, which is default). Only the inner table is selectable. Hence, when 2nd inner table is selected, I want to be able to clear the selection of the 1st inner table. Sorry, I