Hallo Users,
is it impossible to use tomahawk and richfaces in the same app?
My situation:
I develop a webapp that uses jsf1.2, facelets, tomahawk and ajax4jsf
that runs on WebSphere6 and JBoss6.
Now I got a request to deploy to WebSphere7.
I realised, that ajax4jsf-1.1.1.jar mustn't be deploye
Am 26.08.11 15:18, schrieb Georg Füchsle:
2. I really cannot get rid of tomahawk in my app. How can I add some
ajax functionality to my tomahawk app, in a way that keeps it
deployable to new AppServers?
Mhh can you move up to jsf 2.1? Then yo would get ajax out of the box.
Werner
Hallo Werner,
I am not shure what work I have to expect migrating to JSF2.
But thanks, so I will think about this solution, too.
gio
2011/8/26 Werner Punz :
> Am 26.08.11 15:18, schrieb Georg Füchsle:
>
>> 2. I really cannot get rid of tomahawk in my app. How can I add some
>> ajax functionality t
It will be worth it!
On Aug 26, 2011, at 5:09 PM, Georg Füchsle wrote:
> Hallo Werner,
> I am not shure what work I have to expect migrating to JSF2.
> But thanks, so I will think about this solution, too.
> gio
>
> 2011/8/26 Werner Punz :
>> Am 26.08.11 15:18, schrieb Georg Füchsle:
>>
>>> 2.
We are using richfaces 3.3.3 Final and Tomahawk 1.2.9 without any problems.
However, while we originally used a number of t:saveState statements,
I'm not really sure how many we're using now.
I wouldn't think you could use ajax4jsf-1.1.1.jar because that would
have conflicts with richfaces.
A qui
Hello Georg,
This shouldn't be a problem -- RichFaces + Tomahawk is a common combination.
(As a matter of fact, Tomahawk works with just about anything).
It looks like you're using an ancient version of RichFaces, though, because
ajax4jsf.jar is not required in newer versions (I think 3.2 or high
6 matches
Mail list logo
