Re: burntmail

2012-12-04 Thread Howard W. Smith, Jr.
Gerald, I got those auto-responses too, sometime earlier. I think I emailed admin about it, and then I think I re-subscribed to the mailing list. Howard On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Gerald Turner wrote: > Mark Struberg writes: > > > mail came through just fine > > > > LieGrue, > > strub

Backscatter (Was Re: CODI BeanManagerProvider in @FacesConverter breaks PrimeFaces p:pickList p:ajax event="transfer")

2012-12-04 Thread Gerald Turner
Mark Struberg writes: > mail came through just fine > > LieGrue, > strub > >> >> From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." >>To: MyFaces Discussion ; Mark Struberg >> >>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 7:07 AM >>Subject: CODI BeanManagerProvider in @FacesConverter breaks Pr

Re: Bug EXTVAL-130?

2012-12-04 Thread Howard W. Smith, Jr.
I love and use forClass="...". Please take a look at [1] below, when you get a chance to see all the chatter/discussion I had related to this topic. Sometime after this topic, I tried 'again' to use @Advanced and still didn't work. That is why I went with JSF @RequestScopedBeans that contain 'only

Re: Bug EXTVAL-130?

2012-12-04 Thread Gerald Turner
"Howard W. Smith, Jr." writes: > I can confirm the same about CODI @Advanced not working in/with JSF > @FacesConverter. My workaround (in a TomEE/CDI/MyFaces-CODI project) > was to only add the @FacesConverter to JSF @RequestScoped managed > beans, and they are working great in/with TomEE 1.5.1 S

Re: Bug EXTVAL-130?

2012-12-04 Thread Gerald Turner
Hi Gerhard, thanks for the response! Gerhard Petracek writes: > @codi + seam > yes - that's possible. > it depends on what you are using from both. > e.g. in case of the jsf-module of codi + seam-faces you have to veto > one of the producers for the FacesContext. Exactly, jsf/faces modules fro

Re: Bug EXTVAL-130?

2012-12-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi gerald, @codi + seam yes - that's possible. it depends on what you are using from both. e.g. in case of the jsf-module of codi + seam-faces you have to veto one of the producers for the FacesContext. @ "No CreationalContext registered for EL evaluation, it is likely that the the expression fac

Re: Bug EXTVAL-130?

2012-12-04 Thread Howard W. Smith, Jr.
I can confirm the same about CODI @Advanced not working in/with JSF @FacesConverter. My workaround (in a TomEE/CDI/MyFaces-CODI project) was to only add the @FacesConverter to JSF @RequestScoped managed beans, and they are working great in/with TomEE 1.5.1 SNAPSHOT. I have been told that CODI @Adv

Re: CODI ViewAccessScoped destroyed on GET request

2012-12-04 Thread Adrian Gonzalez
I just created an application from scratch, and the problem went away. Everything working fine for now. Sorry for this wrong alert. - Mail original - De : Adrian Gonzalez À : "users@myfaces.apache.org" Cc : Envoyé le : Mardi 4 décembre 2012 11h32 Objet : CODI ViewAccessScoped destroy

Bug EXTVAL-130?

2012-12-04 Thread Gerald Turner
Hello, I'm in the process of converting a JSF2/CDI application from Seam3 to MyFaces ExtCDI/CODI. The application had been using MyFaces ExtVal-BV so that JSR-303 cross-field validation would work in the front-end. Simply replacing Seam3 with CODI evoked the following stacktrace during the first