Hi
You can check here:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/MyFaces/job/myfaces-current22-1/
As soon as the job (#1164) is done, you can take the jars from that
location (which should be the same).
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2013/10/17 Howard W. Smith, Jr.
> Okay, that is great. I'm waitin
Okay, that is great. I'm waiting for the following folders to be updated
with the latest version:
1.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/myfaces/core/myfaces-api/2.2.0-SNAPSHOT/
2.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/myfaces/
Hi
I have found the bug. The problem was caused on a refactor, there was an
old code that skip state saving when view map is empty, but now since there
is a proxy for that implementing StateHolder, the map can be empty but it
holds the view scope key. Since with CDI the beans are stored internally
Hi
I have committed a fix for the problem with the timeout. But I'm curious
about this problem, because I tested this scope and specifically the
@PreDestroy stuff. It should work. But maybe there is a bug somewhere
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2013/10/17 Howard W. Smith, Jr.
> responses inlin
responses inline below,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>
> public void onSessionDestroyed()
> {
> // In CDI case, the best way to deal with this is use a method
> // with @PreDestroy annotation on a session scope bean
> // ( ViewScopeBeanH
Hi
Could you please provide an example to test this stuff properly? The
problem in this point is these lines in the javadoc of
javax.faces.view.ViewScope:
"... In the session expiration case, the runtime must ensure that
FacesContext.getCurrentInstance() returns a valid instance if it is called
d
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
smithh032...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clarification: my test included session.invalidate() instead of (actual)
> session expired (via/after session timeout).
>
> will provide test (config, steps and) results in my next response to this
> thread.
>
Hmmm, based on Gerhard's recent response below,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Gerhard Petracek <
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @myfaces-core:
> the minimal goal is to be spec. compliant.
>
and JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-905[1], I downloaded latest MyFaces 2.2 api
and impl JARs (2013-O
hi moritz,
@myfaces-core:
the minimal goal is to be spec. compliant.
@osgi+cdi:
you might be interested in [1].
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://s.apache.org/Qu7
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
JavaEE Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support
Hi,
I've been recently working on proof of concept code to enable modular
JSF applications in OSGI environments (artifacts spread over multiple
bundles). Following the JCP discussion it very much seems that CDI will
become the primary (potentially mandatory) injection and context
management mechan
10 matches
Mail list logo
