Done (deployed MyFaces 2.2.0 with my app in production).
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
smithh032...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i am really going to have to make the step to migrate to JSF 2.2.
> hopefully will do it, ASAP. thanks again.
Okay, I downloaded MyFaces 2.2.0 (yesterday's release), and added it to my
TomEE 1.6.1 SNAPSHOT (downloaded 2 or 3 days ago), and I decided to test
CDI @ViewScoped @PreDestroy.
Below, you will see that I logged in, and opened a few pages that reference
a few different instances of CDI @ViewScoped
Hello all,
Could you please let me know whether Tobago 1.0.* is still supported in Tomcat
7 (or later versions)?
Thanks a lot for your help and best wishes,
Dom
wow, thanks Mike. (Late) last night, when I was replying to an ANNOUNCE
MyFaces 2.2.0 email, I thought it was the 'beta release'.
I just now recognized that I replied to the (latest) MyFaces 2.2.0 release.
thanks!
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 w
2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 were all released at the same time.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
wrote:
> Will there be another release of MyFaces 2.2, since MyFaces Core 2.1.14 and
> 2.0.20 were released?
>
> I would assume that MyFaces 2.1.14 release fixes would be included in
> MyFa
Will there be another release of MyFaces 2.2, since MyFaces Core 2.1.14 and
2.0.20 were released?
I would assume that MyFaces 2.1.14 release fixes would be included in
MyFaces 2.2, too.
right?
FOLLOWUP:
org.apache.myfaces.application.ResourceHandlerImpl.level = OFF
is working great, thanks again.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
smithh032...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Leonardo for the response. Per javadoc[1], OFF is available as you
> stated. I will give th
Understood. thanks again for the response, Leonardo.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
> Hi Howard
>
> 2014/1/13 Howard W. Smith, Jr. :
> > Leonardo,
> >
> > Some questions for you:
> >
> > 1. How has MyFaces 2.2 (beta) release been performing and/or accepted by
> > MyFace
Understood, thanks Leonardo. i am really going to have to make the step to
migrate to JSF 2.2. hopefully will do it, ASAP. thanks again.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2014/1/13 Howard W. Smith, Jr. :
> > Wow, interesting that you sent this email as I was writi
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Hope this helps.
+1 Mike and thanks for sharing.
it's good to hear/know this about struts. when i learned java ee 6 via java
ee 6 tutorial, of course, JSF is mentioned there; i don't remember struts
being mentioned there at all. so, m
See my answers inline.
Am 14.01.2014 16:40, schrieb Mike Kienenberger:
I am not an expert in action framework concepts, despite having used
struts for several years :) but I have some practical experience with
Struts, an action-based framework. So hopefully I can comment on the
benefits of an
I am not an expert in action framework concepts, despite having used
struts for several years :) but I have some practical experience with
Struts, an action-based framework. So hopefully I can comment on the
benefits of an action-based framework from the perspective a
component-based mindset.
I
Hi
2014/1/13 Howard W. Smith, Jr. :
> Wow, interesting that you sent this email as I was writing my email, asking
> a few questions bout MyFaces 2.2.
>
> Your other posts about MyFaces 2.1.14 (and 2.0.20) inspired/motivated me to
> think about MyFaces 2.2. I am considering migrating my app from My
Hi Howard
2014/1/13 Howard W. Smith, Jr. :
> Leonardo,
>
> Some questions for you:
>
> 1. How has MyFaces 2.2 (beta) release been performing and/or accepted by
> MyFaces user community?
>
We have received some good feedback that has helped a lot to get the new
release.
> 2. Any big corporation/n
Not really but it's just matter of taste ;)
2014/1/14 Karl Kildén
> Action based vs component based is a frequently discussed topic and you can
> probably find many resources arguing for one or the other.
>
> I really like JSF but I am still curious about stuff like this. For example
> if I wan
Action based vs component based is a frequently discussed topic and you can
probably find many resources arguing for one or the other.
I really like JSF but I am still curious about stuff like this. For example
if I want to use a third part javascript library for special corner cases
it might be a
Could you explain what the actual benefits of the action based
programming style are? I am missing the purpose/use cases for the actual
need of such a feature.
Thanks in advance!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
*Christian Beikov
If they add support for such actions with @RequestMapping, then it should
also be possible to declare request params as method params.
e.g.
@RequestMapping(...)
public void doSomething(@RequestParameter(name="..") private String test)
And of course conversion/validation of the request parameters
Hello,
Any opinions on this
https://weblogs.java.net/blog/mriem/archive/2014/01/13/jsf-tip-56-using-action-based-prototype-mojarra
Basically it's regarding the common opinon that JavaEE should have a action
based framework or support a action based style in JSF.
cheers
19 matches
Mail list logo
