Re: dataScroller onclick with Sun RI

What version of the RI and what version of Tomahawk? Stewart Cambridge wrote: > > Hi Myfaces Users, > > I'm using a Tomahawk dataScroller component with a Tomahawk dataTable on a > page. > I have the onclick attribute set on the dataScroller, with the idea > that each rendered link for first,

Re: Exception from MyFaces JSF 1.2 and Weblogic Portal 10 whilst using SUN RI 1.2

Scott O'Bryan wrote: > > No the Sun R.I. is a different codebase then MyFaces. You can log bugs > against the R.I. at java.net > > That said, the stacktrace you've posted is not from the RI code base, > so you're still dealing with MyFaces. > > MC PHERSON Sandy wrote: >> Hello I am trying t

RE: Using Myfaces with Glassfish V2 Final

Hendrik Beck (camunda) wrote: > > Hey Brody! > > I was asking a pretty similar question some days ago and I am still > interesting in getting it running (which I didn't managed to so far). > > Can I ask you that question: Are you interesting in really getting MyFaces > to run on Glassfish or

Re: Problem with StreamingAddResource with JSF RI 1.2 and Firefox

Are you using Facelets? If so, the RI will be defaulting the content type to xhtml instead of html. You can add contentType="text/html" to f:view in your facelets template to force the content type. mjdenham wrote: > > When using StreamingAddResource I get an error if using JSF RI 1.2 and > F

Re: facelets 7 MyFaces error: javax/el/ELResolver

I'd guess removing the el-api JAR from you webapp will do the trick. Wolf Benz-2 wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to get MF & faclets to work together. > 1/ I followed the advice on the site, but I get this error: > > EVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener > instan

Re: null EL expression - "ELResolver cannot handle a null base Object with identifier 'nullValue'"

For what it's worth, I'm seeing the same error when trying to get MyFaces 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT (built from source - would be good if nightly builds could be posted) working in the GlassFish admin-gui. javax.el.PropertyNotFoundException: ELResolver cannot handle a null base Object with identifier 'alert

Re: Myfaces 1.2.0 setup issues (again)

Sorry. That's just gross mis-information. The 1.2 RI has been out for over a year and performance has been a key goal during that period. Maybe you should look at this: http://blogs.sun.com/rlubke/entry/jsf_ri_performance_scalability The 1.2 RI is being used in production and is product

Re: tomahawk 1.1.5 and JSF 1.2/Tomcat 6

I'm not able to reproduce. What do you have in WEB-INF/lib? martind wrote: > > I am using JSF version 1.2_04-b07-FCS. > > Martin > > On 5/31/07, rlubke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> What's the exact version of the RI you're using?

Re: tomahawk 1.1.5 and JSF 1.2/Tomcat 6

What's the exact version of the RI you're using? martind wrote: > > I would like to use tomahawk 1.1.5 with JSF 1.2 RI inside Tomcat 6. Is > this combinatiion supported? I have tried to load the tomahawk > examples, but I get an exception when loading the first page: > > May 31, 2007 8:37:

Re: com.sun.faces.config.ConfigureListener Exception

What version of the RI? Yaron Spektor wrote: > > Hi > > I was wondering if any of you had any experience with this bug: > > Were using sun RI and tomahawk 1.1.5. > > Java version 1.5.0_10_b03 > > As well as Spring and Hibernate. Up to a week ago every thing worked > fine on our tomcat 5.5

Re: tomahawk-ubuntu error

I'm guessing you're running with JDK6. If that's the case, and you're using the 1.2 RI, upgrade to the latest version (https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net). That should resolve your issue. David González-8 wrote: > > Hi all. > > I’m getting a problem using tomahawk_1.1.3 in Ubuntu. > > I

Re: Tomahawk on Glassfish

n't know if my issue is related to this issue on not but I was just > wondering since Glassfish has the newest version of JSF in it. > > Dennis > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-872 > > > > On 3/14/07, rlubke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &

Re: Tomahawk on Glassfish

from JBoss to >> Glassfish. >> >> I don't know if my issue is related to this issue on not but I was just >> wondering since Glassfish has the newest version of JSF in it. >> >> Dennis >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-872 >>

Re: Tomahawk on Glassfish

Excellent! Dennis Gesker-2 wrote: > > Done. Issue #531 > > --Dennis > > On 3/14/07, rlubke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> It's on our list of items to add to our application testing suite. I try >> to >> address the issues

Re: Tomahawk on Glassfish

dering since Glassfish has the newest version of JSF in it. > > Dennis > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-872 > > > > On 3/14/07, rlubke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Ok, I've checked a fix in for this which will be avai

Re: Tomahawk on Glassfish

found here: https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=1703&expandFolder=1703&folderID=0 rlubke wrote: > > This seems to be an incompatibility in the 1.2 API. > In 1.2, the default tags extends UIComponentClassicTagBase as > UIComponentTag wa

Re: Tomahawk on Glassfish

This seems to be an incompatibility in the 1.2 API. In 1.2, the default tags extends UIComponentClassicTagBase as UIComponentTag was deprecated: @deprecated Use of this class has been replaced with [EMAIL PROTECTED] * UIComponentELTag}, which extends * UIComponentClassicTagBase to add proper