ect: Re: BUG? commandLink href URLs too long (jsf_tree_64 value over 6k
>chars)
>
>Well, I haven't used tree2 myself, but are all of those command links
>inside your one form?
>
>It almost sounds like an implementation bug.
>
>
>
>On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[
form for the entire page, you shouldn't need to have
> the attribute duplicated in every commandLink (each of which is
> probably being put into its own form).
>
>
> On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BUG? commandLink href URLs too long (jsf_
ROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BUG? commandLink href URLs too long (jsf_tree_64 value over 6k chars)
> >
> > The length of the value of the 'jsf_tree_64' parameter is 6517
> > characters long in my case, causing IE6 to render links that do
> >
If you use one form for the entire page, you shouldn't need to have
the attribute duplicated in every commandLink (each of which is
probably being put into its own form).
On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BUG? commandLink href URLs too long (jsf_tree_64 va
BUG? commandLink href URLs too long (jsf_tree_64 value over 6k chars)
The length of the value of the 'jsf_tree_64' parameter is 6517
characters long in my case, causing IE6 to render links that do
nothing when clicked. When reducing the number of characters in the
rendered HTM
5 matches
Mail list logo