Re: Dojo integration (was Re: 'Simulating' commandLink from Javascript')

2006-02-03 Thread Rogers Reilly
Martin Marinschek wrote: Our final goal is to get rid of prototype and use dojo instead as our base-library for AJAX. So we want to further AJAXify our component set with the help of dojo, and replace the existing implementations with dojo-functionality. Fantastic, thanks for the

Re: Dojo integration (was Re: 'Simulating' commandLink from Javascript')

2006-02-03 Thread Martin Marinschek
Yes, but that is all really in the beginning, currently. We well be working over the next few months on that. regards, Martin On 2/3/06, Rogers Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Marinschek wrote: Our final goal is to get rid of prototype and use dojo instead as our base-library for

Dojo integration (was Re: 'Simulating' commandLink from Javascript')

2006-02-02 Thread Rogers Reilly
Laurie Harper wrote: Hmm, OK, thanks; that makes sense. So, it's either time to start wrapping Dojo widgets with JSF components, or time to learn about Shale's remoting features ;-) Picking up on this- I'm just about to refactor two Dojo/JSP projects (one work, one personal) into

Re: Dojo integration (was Re: 'Simulating' commandLink from Javascript')

2006-02-02 Thread Martin Marinschek
Our final goal is to get rid of prototype and use dojo instead as our base-library for AJAX. So we want to further AJAXify our component set with the help of dojo, and replace the existing implementations with dojo-functionality. The problem with prototype is lacking namespacing... regards,