Yeah, it took a while to get Trinidad out of incubation, but I think that
good stuff needs time to mature.
The Apache folks take good care that no rubbish appears on their website and
that all projects are with
a healthy community driving them. Frankly - I am quite thankful for this.
*
* Oracle employees still do most of the work
but you have seen a flow of commits/patches coming in from other
yes; that happens, right! We recently voted in another commiter
(outside of Oracle)
people as well, if not, we should not have moved Trinidad out of the
incubator.
I doubt
Hi
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Friedrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Millman wrote:
The quality of Trinidad it a testament to how Open Source communities
work best.
Well, ...
I don't
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Frank Nimphius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samba,
there are plans to open source ADF Faces RC as well, as announced during
JavaOne 2007. I don't know where this will be open sourced. Since it is
different from Trinidad, I think its more likely that it
it a
testament to how Open Source communities work best.
Thanks, Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.mizar.com | (360) 945-2643
From: Frank Nimphius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 12:13 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Doubt about ADF Faces Trinidad
Mark,
Oracle's
How do you know the next drop won't be dubbed Trinidad 2.0? It's
certainly built off the Trinidad framework and the tag libraries are
virtually identical.
Scott
Stephen Friedrich wrote:
Mark Millman wrote:
The quality of Trinidad it a testament to how Open Source communities
work best.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Friedrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Millman wrote:
The quality of Trinidad it a testament to how Open Source communities work
best.
Well, ...
I don't really agree, but maybe I am not involved deeply enough in the
community to judge.
Hi! Frank,
is there any plan to donate the new ADF Faces RC to Trinidad any time in
the future?
If yes, then that will be great day for Open Source java ...
Anyway, I feel Customers don't use Oracle just for ADF Faces, they go for
the better part of it-- ADF BC, ADF Bindings which improve
Greetings to everyone,
We are starting to develop our web applications with ADF Faces, but we want
to know if the apache 2.0 license apply to ADF Faces or we need to switch to
Trinidad. Also, if we are working with JDeveloper, if as simply as changing
the lib's to the Trinidad.
Thanks a
Trinidad is the Apache 2.0 licensed stuff.
ADF Faces is licensed by Oracle.
in jdev 10g there are some issues, when you are trying to use Trinidad
with things like ADFm.
in jdev 11g trinidad will be used for ADF Faces 10g migrations, so
next to ADF Faces Rich Client,
Trinidad is supported in
In addition ..
using Trinidad without ADF works in JDeveloper 10g as well. If you use
your own model binding then accessing ADF BC also becomes possible
Frank
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Trinidad is the Apache 2.0 licensed stuff.
ADF Faces is licensed by Oracle.
in jdev 10g there are
No,
ADF Faces doesn't force you to licence OracleAs. The opposite is true.
If you have an OracleAs licence then there is no ADF Faces licence fee
to pay
Frank
Simon Lessard wrote:
Hello Aaron
Another addition. If you use ADF Faces, I think Oracle license forces
you to use OracleAS so
Ah, I see the subtlety, but it still mean that you have to pay for ADF Faces
if you don't use it within OracleAS right?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Frank Nimphius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No,
ADF Faces doesn't force you to licence OracleAs. The opposite is true. If
you have an OracleAs
Simon,
yes. This is true - we can't beat the "free" in Trinidad ;-)
Frank
Simon Lessard wrote:
Ah, I see the subtlety, but it still mean that you have to pay for ADF
Faces if you don't use it within OracleAS right?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Frank Nimphius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27, 2008 8:01 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Doubt about ADF Faces Trinidad
Simon,
yes. This is true - we can't beat the free in Trinidad ;-)
Frank
Simon Lessard wrote:
Ah, I see the subtlety, but it still mean that you have to pay for ADF Faces
if you don't use it within OracleAS
15 matches
Mail list logo
