Re: General JSF 1.2 + Facelets question

2009-12-23 Thread Jakob Korherr
Hi Bart, Actually he uses JSF 1.2. I just looked that part up in the newest doc (JSF 2.0). Regards, Jakob 2009/12/23 Bart Kummel > Hi Surija, > > Am I getting you right? Are you using Facelets 1.1.14 with a JSF 2.0 > implementation? That's weird, as JSF 2.0 includes a newer version of > Facele

Re: General JSF 1.2 + Facelets question

2009-12-23 Thread Bart Kummel
Hi Surija, Am I getting you right? Are you using Facelets 1.1.14 with a JSF 2.0 implementation? That's weird, as JSF 2.0 includes a newer version of Facelets. You shouldn't use a separate Facelets lib when using JSF 2.0. Regards, Bart Kummel On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 16:22, Luka Surija wrote: >

Re: General JSF 1.2 + Facelets question

2009-12-19 Thread Luka Surija
Yeah, it works. Thank you. I'm just wondering the behavior is changed between facelets 1.1.13 and 1.1.14? Luka Surija Jakob Korherr wrote: Hi Luka, The JSF 2.0 specification only explains that when attaching a , an ActionListener (with specific behavior) should be created and added to the

Re: General JSF 1.2 + Facelets question

2009-12-16 Thread Jakob Korherr
Hi Luka, The JSF 2.0 specification only explains that when attaching a , an ActionListener (with specific behavior) should be created and added to the nesting UIComponent (which has to implement ActionSource) with addActionListener(). >From my point of view it is not clear which is added first, t

General JSF 1.2 + Facelets question

2009-12-16 Thread Luka Surija
It looks like i'm not familiar with JSF as much as I've thought. What is the expected behavior in JSF 1.2 + Facelets for f:setPropertyActionListener? code: Name #{item.name} target="#{PersonMB.person}" /> t