Hello jonathan,
i have read (in the mailing list) that this parameter does not work
and will be removed in future versions.
regards,
Richard Capraro
2006/6/27, Baker,Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
org.apache.myfaces.PRETTY_HTML
true
Changing this setting between true an
Title: PRETTY_HTML
org.apache.myfaces.PRETTY_HTML
true
Changing this setting between true and false in my web.xml makes no difference on the html source shown to me in firefox or ie.
Is this setting not functional in myfaces 1.1.3/tomahawk 1.1.2, or could
Volker Weber wrote:
>
> and add
>
>
> Filter for JSP
> JTidyFilter
> org.w3c.tidy.servlet.filter.JTidyFilter
>
> tee
> false
>
>
>
> JTidyFilter
> /faces/*
>
>
> to your web.xml.
>
> To enable PrettyPrint set init-param 'tree' to true, th
-Original Message-
> OK
>
> I looked into what JTidy delivers. Unfortunately it is not what we
want
> :(
>
> The current jtidyServletFilter just VALIDATES the html and includes a
> validation-icon into the html-code delivered.The PrettyPrint feature
is
> only
> available in the full-feature
Hi,
Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) wrote:
> OK
>
> I looked into what JTidy delivers. Unfortunately it is not what we want
> :(
>
> The current jtidyServletFilter just VALIDATES the html and includes a
> validation-icon into the html-code delivered.The PrettyPrint feature is
> only
> available in the f
-Original Message-
Hm, probably someone could extend Jtidy to support the Pretty HTML
feature also...
-/Original Message-
We still can "give it back to them", if they want...
-Original Message-
Writing to log-files IMHO is a little bit difficult to work with. Often
you hav
age-
> From: Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 10:16 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] PRETTY_HTML, was [RE: JFS's html output]
>
> OK
>
> I looked into what JTidy delivers. Unfo
OK
I looked into what JTidy delivers. Unfortunately it is not what we want
:(
The current jtidyServletFilter just VALIDATES the html and includes a
validation-icon into the html-code delivered.The PrettyPrint feature is
only
available in the full-featured jtidy.
What we could do is: Take the f
+1 for that.
- Brendan
-Original Message-
From: Strittmatter, Stephan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 7:27 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] PRETTY_HTML, was [RE: JFS's html output]
On the other hand, when there is already su
+1 as well
Strittmatter, Stephan wrote:
> On the other hand, when there is already such an ExtensionFilter in
> jtidy (I also haven't known that), why spend efford to make pretty
> output in myFaces?
>
> Why not removing the context parameter org.apache.myfaces.PRETTY_HTML
> and create instead a
+1 for that. I was never a big fan of the PRETTY_HTML and I never
found it to work very well anyways.
sean
On 10/25/05, Strittmatter, Stephan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, when there is already such an ExtensionFilter in
> jtidy (I also haven't known that), wh
dy as
ExtentionFilter?
Just focusing on the main goal of MyFaces...
Regards,
Stephan
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:05 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] PRETTY_HTML, was
-Original Message-
I prefer to add a additional filter instead of doing this in the
ExtensionFilter.
jtidy has already a filter for this:
http://jtidy.sourceforge.net/multiproject/jtidyservlet/filter.html
-/Original Message-
That's what I had hopes for (just no time to check ;-)
I prefer to add a additional filter instead of doing this in the
ExtensionFilter.
jtidy has already a filter for this:
http://jtidy.sourceforge.net/multiproject/jtidyservlet/filter.html
regards
Volker
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> Well, you might want to do it in IE?
>
> something like JTidy in
-Original Message-
Well, you might want to do it in IE?
-/Original Message-
EG. to check out the correct functioning of a renderer that has to
render different html for differnet browsers...
-Original Message-
something like JTidy in our ExtensionFilter might be a good opt
Well, you might want to do it in IE?
something like JTidy in our ExtensionFilter might be a good option.
regards,
Martin
On 10/25/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not checked out the code yet, but I guess
> the easiest solution to deal with it would be a servlet
> filter.
>
>
I have not checked out the code yet, but I guess
the easiest solution to deal with it would be a servlet
filter.
Maybe a phase listener also would be possible.
But why implement it at all, to my experience
the Mozilla plugin gives excellent results.
Werner
Strittmatter, Stephan wrote:
> Hi,
>
-Original Message-
Just for discussion:
Why implement the "pretty-html" option in every renderer?
I think, it would be easier to postprocess the content in the framework
before returning the complete html-content to the browser. What do you
think?
I found e.g. http://sourceforge.net/projec
Hi,
some weeks ago I tried this option also without having pretty code.
Just for discussion:
Why implement the "pretty-html" option in every renderer?
I think, it would be easier to postprocess the content in the framework
before returning the complete html-content to the browser. What do you
th
19 matches
Mail list logo
